Comment 2 for bug 45677

I'm not sure this bug is the right place to comment on the htmllog behaviour, but I cannot thing of anything better.

Is it really necessary to show off the revision ids in the output of htmllog? Revision ids look messy, do not contain any human readable information that's not in the date or comitter, and are not normally needed to use bzr.

Making revision ids an implementation detail is a design goal of bzr, they should not be advertised this prominently.