Martin Albisetti wrote:
> I think the general feeling is right, but I'm not sure what the
> best way to solve this is.
There has been talk about file-type-specific merges. Perhaps a custom
merge handler specific to .bzrignore would be an option here?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Martin Albisetti wrote:
> I think the general feeling is right, but I'm not sure what the
> best way to solve this is.
There has been talk about file-type-specific merges. Perhaps a custom
merge handler specific to .bzrignore would be an option here?
Cheers,
Jelmer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iJwEAQECAAYFAkp nUw0ACgkQDLQl4Q YPZuUzNQP/ fZQYz8tb9IGVi8b /WUvBIYBo 4cONfg2GIFhUGs5 6ASt89jgmYGQOCD VAUCgAHEFjNOXYa q0zV p2b7D4y9HHUewrA VPOmsrY0nRhNZcu VBbuMeAjfbo0zig Roij lY94=
fIoeSPSJN3BkQ7U
SVGAeIACiTpCehk
h+dhZlCM6mGV4rV
=Yurv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----