The implementation in subversion is very poor and should probably not be used for anything, except an example of how not to do it. Though they claimed to improve it in 1.6 (haven't tried that version).
Just recording the original revision information would be fine IMO, so that later merges know it's been merged already. git is probably a better inspiration.
The implementation in subversion is very poor and should probably not be used for anything, except an example of how not to do it. Though they claimed to improve it in 1.6 (haven't tried that version).
Just recording the original revision information would be fine IMO, so that later merges know it's been merged already. git is probably a better inspiration.