Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Would an eventual patch that adds support for rebase to pump be
> rejected?
Possibly. The argument against accepting it would be that I don't want
to think that rebase is encouraged and supported.
I don't understand why you would want to use rebase and pipes together.
Rebase is usually used to treat individual commits as pipes. In a
sense, pipelines and loom are an alternative to rebase.
Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> Would an eventual patch that adds support for rebase to pump be
> rejected?
Possibly. The argument against accepting it would be that I don't want
to think that rebase is encouraged and supported.
I don't understand why you would want to use rebase and pipes together.
Rebase is usually used to treat individual commits as pipes. In a
sense, pipelines and loom are an alternative to rebase.
Aaron enigmail. mozdev. org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkr V2TYACgkQ0F+ nu1YWqI0jewCffe xLrb8Uks6uzBn2a uVgYI/5 pYAsrCricpydfyD be
A7QAnjNEqKXxvSz
=LCU9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----