Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Sure, but so are a lot of other sites. We'd need a generic way to warn
> git users that rsh specs aren't supported, not one specific to github.
>
As one of the major hosting sites, it seems reasonable to have a special
case for it if we can't find an easy way to do a generic solution.
I suppose we could always warn if ':' is found in the path (and not an
obvious drive letter on Windows).
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Sure, but so are a lot of other sites. We'd need a generic way to warn
> git users that rsh specs aren't supported, not one specific to github.
>
As one of the major hosting sites, it seems reasonable to have a special
case for it if we can't find an easy way to do a generic solution.
I suppose we could always warn if ':' is found in the path (and not an
obvious drive letter on Windows).
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
9VuAACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMv1ACgiC2XG BClRiETrIfxO6gt kmYt mqfOpsUaqsSf/ RN7l
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkt
t7UAn1HAQN3ImvT
=1PHk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----