Using revisionspec syntax would probably be good here.
Currently "bzr bisect yes/no -rrevno" also changes to revno. This can be a bit annoying since it can take some time on a bigger tree. Would be better to just give a range and run at the same time.
Using revisionspec syntax would probably be good here.
Currently "bzr bisect yes/no -rrevno" also changes to revno. This can be a bit annoying since it can take some time on a bigger tree. Would be better to just give a range and run at the same time.