Shouldn't allow task or blueprint reassignment to an upstream that doesn't use Launchpad
Bug #34343 reported by
Brad Bollenbach
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Launchpad itself |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
I reassigned a bug to bzrtools, by editing the product field on +editstatus. It turns out that bzrtools doesn't use Malone, so I should have gotten an error message when I reassigned it.
Steps to reproduce (using sample data):
1. Open http://
2. Change the product to "thunderbird" (a product that doesn't use malone officially);
3. Click "Save Changes";
4. End up with a read-only upstream bugtask.
Changed in malone: | |
assignee: | nobody → bjornt |
status: | Unconfirmed → Confirmed |
description: | updated |
Changed in malone: | |
assignee: | Björn Tillenius (bjornt) → nobody |
Changed in blueprint: | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
summary: |
- Shouldn't allow task reassignment to an upstream that doesn't use Malone + Shouldn't allow task or blueprint reassignment to an upstream that + doesn't use Malone |
summary: |
Shouldn't allow task or blueprint reassignment to an upstream that - doesn't use Malone + doesn't use Launchpad |
Changed in launchpad: | |
importance: | Medium → High |
Changed in launchpad: | |
importance: | High → Low |
tags: | added: target-picker |
To post a comment you must log in.
This should be allowed; we do this in Ubuntu to record the fact that a bug is an upstream bug, regardless of whether the upstream uses Malone. Per discussions with Mark, this is also a good idea because it provides useful content for upstreams who come looking for it.
It should perhaps be made clear to the user what they can expect from this action, but it shouldn't be disallowed