FTBFS due to "make check" failure
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
util-linux (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Dan Bungert |
Bug Description
My upload of the util-linux merge as 2.39.1-3ubuntu1 FTBFS due to "make check" failures.
I have seen several tests fail.
In Debian, the fadvise/drop can fail:
https:/
This is probably fixed by:
https:/
In local testing, I have seen the following tests fail (albeit in different builders):
fincore/count
lsfd/mkfds-
fincore: count file contents in core ...
diff-{{{
--- /home/user/
+++ /home/user/
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
[ NO EXCITING FILE ]
+[ NO EXCITING FILE ]
return value: 1
0 0 i_EMPTY_FILE
return value: 0
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@
1 134217728 i_WINDOW_
return value: 0
[ MULTIPLE FILES ]
+[ MULTIPLE FILES ]
PAGES SIZE FILE
0 0 i_EMPTY_FILE
1 4095 i_PAGESIZE_
}}}-diff
FAILED (fincore/count)
lsfd: NETLINK sockets ...
diff-{{{
--- /tmp/autopkgtes
.353163540 +0000
- 3 NETLINK protocol=sock_diag lport= raw sock_diag 0
-ASSOC,
-LPORT: OK
+test_mkfds: failed in bind(2): Bad file descriptor
}}}-diff
FAILED (lsfd/mkfds-
Changed in util-linux (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Dan Bungert (dbungert) |
status: | New → In Progress |
tags: | removed: update-excuse |
This bug was fixed in the package util-linux - 2.39.1-4ubuntu1
---------------
util-linux (2.39.1-4ubuntu1) mantic; urgency=medium
* d/p/ubuntu/ lp-2019856- add-missing- arm-cores. patch: name-pidfd, lsfd/mkfds- pidfd that fail when run hwclock. rules and debian/ util-linux. hwclock. default, recent fallback- static- sh.patch: Add support for /bin/static-sh as lockedpwd. patch: Make sure file systems can be fixed on
Drop this patch, as it has been incorporated
* skip tests lsfd/column-
using the Focal kernel (LP: #2030793)
* Merge from Debian unstable
Remaining changes:
- Build hwclock with audit support.
- Drop debian/
kernels sync the RTC automatically.
- Add sulogin-
fallback if the regular shell fails to execute. Patch ported from
sysvinit. (see LP #505887)
- Add sulogin-
machines with locked root accounts (as Ubuntu does by default). Don't
require --force for sulogin.
-- Dan Bungert <email address hidden> Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:39:16 -0600