[SRU] There is now a dependency on paramiko v1.8.0
Bug #1150720 reported by
Geraint North
This bug affects 3 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cinder |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Avishay Traeger | ||
Folsom |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Avishay Traeger | ||
cinder (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Raring |
Won't Fix
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
paramiko (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Precise |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Quantal |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
Raring |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
When bringing up Cinder with the storwize_svc driver, the default paramiko install on Power RHEL 6.3 (1.7.6) produced the following error when cinder-volume started:
SSHException: Error connecting via ssh: PID check failed. RNG must be re-initialized after fork(). Hint: Try Random.atfork()
Moving up to paramiko 1.9.0 fixed the issue. We haven't diagnosed the root cause of the failure using 1.7.6.
Related branches
lp://staging/~gandelman-a/ubuntu/quantal/cinder/2012.2.4
- Openstack Ubuntu Testers: Pending requested
-
Diff: 34 lines (+27/-0)1 file modifieddebian/changelog (+27/-0)
CVE References
Changed in cinder: | |
assignee: | nobody → Avishay Traeger (avishay-il) |
Changed in paramiko (Ubuntu Quantal): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in paramiko (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → High |
Changed in paramiko (Ubuntu Quantal): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
no longer affects: | cinder (Ubuntu Precise) |
no longer affects: | cinder (Ubuntu Quantal) |
Changed in cinder (Ubuntu Raring): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → High |
Changed in cinder: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
summary: |
- There is now a dependency on paramiko v1.9.0 + There is now a dependency on paramiko v1.8.0 |
tags: | added: folsom-backport-potential |
summary: |
- There is now a dependency on paramiko v1.8.0 + [SRU] There is now a dependency on paramiko v1.8.0 |
tags: | removed: folsom-backport-potential in-stable-folsom |
To post a comment you must log in.
I have seen this from another user as well.