ecryptfs_encrypt_page: Error attempting to write lower page (regression)
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eCryptfs |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Tyler Hicks | ||
linux (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Tyler Hicks |
Bug Description
NOTE: A test case for this bug has been created at tests/kernel/
After upgrading to 3.2.0-30 I started seeing error messages like this in my syslog:
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.675991] ecryptfs_
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.675997] ecryptfs_writepage: Error encrypting page (upper index [0x000000000000
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.676058] ecryptfs_
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.676061] ecryptfs_writepage: Error encrypting page (upper index [0x000000000000
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.676119] ecryptfs_
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.676122] ecryptfs_writepage: Error encrypting page (upper index [0x000000000000
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.676179] ecryptfs_
Sep 7 11:56:28 artemy-tregubenko kernel: [ 318.676182] ecryptfs_writepage: Error encrypting page (upper index [0x000000000000
I have a one-partition setup and my whole home folder is encrypted. I did a fsck and that didn't help. I removed zero-size files from ~/.Private and that didn't help. I backed data, deleted user and its home folder, created user again and copied data back, and error was still there.
Booting to previous kernel 3.2.0-29 solved the issue. This is why I consider this bug a regression.
Now I know there's a bug #870326 which is pretty much identical to this. I couldn't find "reopen" button however and I don't know how you guys like to track regressions in launchpad. I'm sorry for creating a duplicate. Please advise me what to do? If I just add new comment to the resolved bug, won't it get lost?
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: ecryptfs-utils 96-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-30-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelMo
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Sep 7 11:56:48 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release amd64 (20110427.1)
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/zsh
SourcePackage: ecryptfs-utils
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-08-11 (26 days ago)
Related branches
CVE References
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in linux (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Incomplete → Confirmed |
Changed in ecryptfs: | |
status: | New → In Progress |
importance: | Undecided → High |
assignee: | nobody → Tyler Hicks (tyhicks) |
tags: | added: cscc |
Hello - Thanks for reporting this.
This part of the eCryptfs code did change between 3.2.0-29 and 3.2.0-30, but I don't immediately see what the problem could be.
Can you give some more details about what you're doing (any commands that you're running, what apps you're using, etc.) when you see these messages printed to logs? It would help in reproducing this bug and finding the problem. Thanks!