As a user, I prefer my suggestion from #1 as well. But renaming "unnamed" to "mixed" is an improvement that takes almost no effort to implement, so it might be a good interim measure. Fixing the deeper problem is significantly more work (otherwise someone would have fixed this bug properly already!).
As a user, I prefer my suggestion from #1 as well. But renaming "unnamed" to "mixed" is an improvement that takes almost no effort to implement, so it might be a good interim measure. Fixing the deeper problem is significantly more work (otherwise someone would have fixed this bug properly already!).