> IMO, current tag object and serialization format does not save info about
> deleted tags, so in current tags format resolve this issue almost impossible.
> IMO, it's require new rich tag support.
That's correct. You could keep the same format by allowing them to
point to say '' or some special revision and changing the tag command
to not display them.
> Am I right that it's something people called in the past "versioned tags"?
This wouldn't require full merging of tags, though doing so would also
solve this bug.
> IMO, current tag object and serialization format does not save info about
> deleted tags, so in current tags format resolve this issue almost impossible.
> IMO, it's require new rich tag support.
That's correct. You could keep the same format by allowing them to
point to say '' or some special revision and changing the tag command
to not display them.
> Am I right that it's something people called in the past "versioned tags"?
This wouldn't require full merging of tags, though doing so would also
solve this bug.
--
Martin