Comment 8 for bug 1672545
Revision history for this message
| Iain Lane (laney) wrote Re: [Bug 1672545] Re: update_excuses: show why a package "does not have binaries" | #8 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
513534c
demo site
(Get the code!)
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:11:18AM -0000, Balint Reczey wrote:
> What I'm aiming at is having fewer packages stuck in migration but with
> more helpful information available for unblocking them.
That's very good - I'm just a little worried about having
proposed-migration itself be the place that centralises all of this
information.
Not saying that it should definitely *not* be there, but we might want
to consider alternatives first - like coming up with an Ubuntu specific
simple PTS-type thing to keep our parts separate from upstream p-m.
(update_
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ <email address hidden> ]
Debian Developer [ <email address hidden> ]
Ubuntu Developer [ <email address hidden> ]