Javier's second branch makes a lot of sense to me -- showing /exactly/ what's in the "Time in Other Locations" list, nothing more, nothing less. Easy for programmers to write, and (one hopes) easy for everyone to understand.
IMO the first step for this ticket is to get Design to revise the spec <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimeAndDate#Time_in_other_locations> to talk about what items should go in Other Locations (the geo_location and current_location entries that we use now aren't in the spec) and how to sort them (should they follow the ordering specified by the user in Time & Date Settings? or sorted by timezone as per bug #833325)?
Javier's second branch makes a lot of sense to me -- showing /exactly/ what's in the "Time in Other Locations" list, nothing more, nothing less. Easy for programmers to write, and (one hopes) easy for everyone to understand.
IMO the first step for this ticket is to get Design to revise the spec <https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/TimeAndDate #Time_in_ other_locations> to talk about what items should go in Other Locations (the geo_location and current_location entries that we use now aren't in the spec) and how to sort them (should they follow the ordering specified by the user in Time & Date Settings? or sorted by timezone as per bug #833325)?