Michael Terry wrote:
> I don't think Gonzalo is subscribed to this bug, but he knows about it
> and may read it. I already told him to try ulimit -n 4096 in the Debian
> bug, but he didn't mention whether it worked for him. Since he later
> ran into this problem again, I'm betting he didn't try it (since that
> has seemed to work for everybody else with this problem).
I replied to the Debian bug just now. Perhaps he'll see it. This
appears to be a totally different problem from the long incremental
backup chains.
Michael Terry wrote:
> I don't think Gonzalo is subscribed to this bug, but he knows about it
> and may read it. I already told him to try ulimit -n 4096 in the Debian
> bug, but he didn't mention whether it worked for him. Since he later
> ran into this problem again, I'm betting he didn't try it (since that
> has seemed to work for everybody else with this problem).
I replied to the Debian bug just now. Perhaps he'll see it. This
appears to be a totally different problem from the long incremental
backup chains.