On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Max Bowsher <email address hidden> wrote:
>> Also, there's more than one udd instance out there doing
>> things unrelated to udd.
>
> So, you're saying you want the lp:udd codebase so support using an
> anonymous token, so that the not-UDD binary symbols thing can use it,
> whilst actually-UDD remains as it currently is?
Not really, just saying that the code in lp:udd can & is being used by
others, but they aren't using the same user as udd is. Thus the point
about tracking is specific to one particular deployment.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Max Bowsher <email address hidden> wrote:
>> Also, there's more than one udd instance out there doing
>> things unrelated to udd.
>
> So, you're saying you want the lp:udd codebase so support using an
> anonymous token, so that the not-UDD binary symbols thing can use it,
> whilst actually-UDD remains as it currently is?
Not really, just saying that the code in lp:udd can & is being used by
others, but they aren't using the same user as udd is. Thus the point
about tracking is specific to one particular deployment.
jml