Should perhaps this not be ubuntuone.desktopcouch instead? Should this perhaps also be instead provided by ubuntuone-client, rather than desktopcouch? Doing so would help keep a clearer separation between the two, and further the idea that ubuntuone-client is the basic client integration point for our services.
Should perhaps this not be ubuntuone. desktopcouch instead? Should this perhaps also be instead provided by ubuntuone-client, rather than desktopcouch? Doing so would help keep a clearer separation between the two, and further the idea that ubuntuone-client is the basic client integration point for our services.