Azure: net: mana: Configure hwc timeout from hardware

Patch submitted for review: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/2023-September/143017.html

This bug is awaiting verification that the linux-azure/6.2.0-1016.16 kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-lunar-linux-azure' to 'verification-done-lunar-linux-azure'. If the problem still exists, change the tag 'verification-needed-lunar-linux-azure' to 'verification-failed-lunar-linux-azure'.

If verification is not done by 5 working days from today, this fix will be dropped from the source code, and this bug will be closed.

See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you!

This bug was fixed in the package linux-azure - 6.5.0-1007.7

---------------
linux-azure (6.5.0-1007.7) mantic; urgency=medium

  * mantic/linux-azure: 6.5.0-1007.7 -proposed tracker (LP: #2038690)

  * Azure: net: mana: Configure hwc timeout from hardware (LP: #2036627)
    - net: mana: Configure hwc timeout from hardware

  [ Ubuntu: 6.5.0-9.9 ]

  * mantic/linux: 6.5.0-9.9 -proposed tracker (LP: #2038687)
  * update apparmor and LSM stacking patch set (LP: #2028253)
    - re-apply apparmor 4.0.0
  * Disable restricting unprivileged change_profile by default, due to LXD
    latest/stable not yet compatible with this new apparmor feature
    (LP: #2038567)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: Make apparmor_restrict_unprivileged_unconfined opt-in

  [ Ubuntu: 6.5.0-8.8 ]

  * mantic/linux: 6.5.0-8.8 -proposed tracker (LP: #2038577)
  * update apparmor and LSM stacking patch set (LP: #2028253)
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [02/60]: rename SK_CTX() to aa_sock and make it an
      inline fn
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [05/60]: Add sysctls for additional controls of unpriv
      userns restrictions
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [08/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Identify modules by more
      than name
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [09/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Add an LSM identifier for
      external use
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [10/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Identify the process
      attributes for each module
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [11/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Maintain a table of LSM
      attribute data
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [12/60]: Stacking v38: proc: Use lsmids instead of lsm
      names for attrs
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [13/60]: Stacking v38: integrity: disassociate
      ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [14/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Infrastructure management
      of the sock security
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [15/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Add the lsmblob data
      structure.
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [16/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: provide lsm name and id
      slot mappings
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [17/60]: Stacking v38: IMA: avoid label collisions with
      stacked LSMs
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [18/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_audit_rule_match
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [19/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_kernel_act_as
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [20/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_secctx_to_secid
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [21/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_secid_to_secctx
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [22/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_ipc_getsecid
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [23/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_current_getsecid
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [24/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_inode_getsecid
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [25/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmblob in
      security_cred_getsecid
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [26/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Specify which LSM to
      display
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [28/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Ensure the correct LSM
      context releaser
    - SAUCE: apparmor3.2.0 [29/60]: Stacking v38: LSM: Use lsmcontext in
      s...