[MIR][jammy] oem-sutton-barossa-meta

Bug #2011703 reported by OEM Taipei Bot
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
OEM Priority Project
Fix Committed
Critical
Bin Li
Ubuntu
In Progress
Undecided
Unassigned
Jammy
New
Undecided
Unassigned
oem-sutton-barossa-meta (Ubuntu)
Jammy
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Background]

Please see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/OEMMeta for details.

[Impact]

 1. Upgrade path: Users will be upgrading from a package in the associated OEM archive, not the Ubuntu archive.
 2. The background and impact of the situation for this change, and it's impact.

[Testing]

 1. Test that `ubuntu-drivers list-oem` lists the meta-package on the relevant hardware
 2. Test that fully installing the meta-package (upgrading to the OEM archive if relevant) works properly on the hardware
 3. Do an offline install. Boot the system. Run update-manager. Check that an upgrade to the OEM package is offered and that it completes successfully and the hardware works properly.

[Regression Potential]

Most potential regressions will live in the package set that will be installed via dependency of this package, which live in OEM archive (outside of Ubuntu) and control by OEM team. OEM team and other corresponding team need take responsibility of those dependency installed.

[When switching kernel flavour] Check that the new kernel flavour works on the target platform.

[Availability]
This is a meta package for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM that means the package doesn't exist in Debian or Ubuntu archive yet.
The source code of the oem-sutton-barossa-meta for jammy:
    git clone -b barossa-jammy-ubuntu https://git.launchpad.net/~oem-solutions-engineers/pc-enablement/+git/oem-sutton-projects-meta

[Rationale]
We want to improve the hardware support for some Lenovo platforms.

[Security]
No CVE/known security issue.

[Quality assurance]
I have used ppa:oem-solutions-engineers/oem-projects-meta to check this package on some Lenovo platforms.
oem-sutton-barossa-meta will be upgraded to 22.04ubuntu1 or the later version from OEM archive.

[Dependencies]
It only depends on ubuntu-oem-keyring.

[Standards compliance]
This package should have met all requirements of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM.

[Maintenance]
Canonical OEM Enablement Team will take care of the maintenance.

[Background information]
Please check https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MIRTeam/Exceptions/OEM for details.

Please use "oem-metapackage-mir-check" in lp:ubuntu-archive-tools to verify this MIR against the reference package in the archive.

https://ubuntu.com/certified/202303-31354
https://ubuntu.com/certified/202303-31355
https://ubuntu.com/certified/202303-31356
https://ubuntu.com/certified/202303-31357
https://ubuntu.com/certified/202303-31426

Changed in oem-priority:
assignee: nobody → OEM Taipei Bot (oem-taipei-bot)
importance: Undecided → Critical
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Bin Li (binli) wrote :

Attach oem-sutton-barossa-meta_22.04~ubuntu1.debdiff by oem-scripts 1.83.

description: updated
summary: - [DRAFT][MIR][jammy] oem-sutton-barossa-meta
+ [MIR][jammy] oem-sutton-barossa-meta
Changed in oem-priority:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
tags: added: oem-scripts-1.83
removed: oem-scripts-1.66
Changed in oem-priority:
assignee: OEM Taipei Bot (oem-taipei-bot) → Bin Li (binli)
Bin Li (binli)
description: updated
Changed in oem-priority:
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: oem-needs-upload oem-scripts-1.84 ubuntu-certified
removed: oem-scripts-1.83
Changed in ubuntu:
status: New → In Progress
tags: added: oem-done-upload oem-scripts-1.86
removed: oem-needs-upload oem-scripts-1.84
Revision history for this message
Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot (crichton) wrote :

The attachment "oem-sutton-barossa-meta_22.04~ubuntu1.debdiff" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are member of the ~ubuntu-sponsors, unsubscribe the team.

[This is an automated message performed by a Launchpad user owned by ~brian-murray, for any issue please contact him.]

tags: added: patch
Revision history for this message
Julian Andres Klode (juliank) wrote :

Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors as OEM handles internally and general sponsorship queue doesn't work well for this.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

Due to the nature of these oem packages, when it was accepted into jammy-proposed, the standard SRU comment and tags were not added to this bug. I just added them manually, and please consider this package ready for SRU verification.

Changed in oem-sutton-barossa-meta (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: New → Fix Committed
no longer affects: oem-sutton-barossa-meta (Ubuntu)
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
Revision history for this message
Bin Li (binli) wrote :
Download full text (4.6 KiB)

After enabled the proposed channel, I could install the meta package successfully.

u@P3-Ultra-9:~$ ubuntu-drivers list-oem
oem-sutton-barossa-meta

u@P3-Ultra-9:~$ apt-cache policy oem-sutton-barossa-meta
oem-sutton-barossa-meta:
  Installed: (none)
  Candidate: 22.04~ubuntu1
  Version table:
     22.04~ubuntu1 500
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main i386 Packages

u@P3-Ultra-9:~$ sudo apt install oem-sutton-barossa-meta
...
Need to get 1,916 B of archives.
After this operation, 13.3 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 oem-sutton-barossa-meta all 22.04~ubuntu1 [1,916 B]

u@P3-Ultra-9:~$ sudo apt update

u@P3-Ultra-9:~$ apt-cache policy oem-sutton-barossa-meta
oem-sutton-barossa-meta: ...

Read more...

Revision history for this message
Bin Li (binli) wrote :

Do an offline install. Boot the system. Run update-manager. It could
install the meta packages successfully.

tags: added: verification-done verification-done-jammy
removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package oem-sutton-barossa-meta - 22.04~ubuntu1

---------------
oem-sutton-barossa-meta (22.04~ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium

  * Meta package for Sutton Barossa. (LP: #2011703)

 -- Bin Li <email address hidden> Tue, 14 Mar 2023 12:25:27 +0800

Changed in oem-sutton-barossa-meta (Ubuntu Jammy):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for oem-sutton-barossa-meta has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.