libgphobos1: ABI breakage in SRU

Bug #1901080 reported by Steve Langasek
14
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
a7xpg (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
dub (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
dustmite (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
gcc-10 (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
High
Unassigned
Focal
New
Undecided
Unassigned
gunroar (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
ii-esu (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
mu-cade (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
parsec47 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
projectl (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
tatan (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
titanion (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
torus-trooper (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
tumiki-fighters (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
val-and-rick (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Focal
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

gcc-10 was a shipped as a pre-release version in focal, which saw an ABI change in libgphobos with the GCC 10.2 release. Now instead of reverting this change, just rebuild the affected packages, mostly some games implemented in D, and dub.

Validation: CHeck the autopkg tests where available, check at least one game, that it starts.

Regression potential: low, no-change rebuilds with the updated GCC 10.3.

Original report:
gcc-10 was SRUed to focal, and in the process introduced regressions caused by ABI breakage of libgphobos1.

This has manifested as failing autopkgtests of the dub package, following unrelated SRUs:

[...]
autopkgtest [13:52:44]: test run: - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - - - - -
dub: symbol lookup error: dub: undefined symbol: _D3std3net4curl4HTTP9__mixin376onSendMFNdDFAvZmZv
[...]

The symbol present in the new version of libgphobos1 is now _D3std3net4curl4HTTP9__mixin396onSendMFNdDFAvZmZv instead of _D3std3net4curl4HTTP9__mixin376onSendMFNdDFAvZmZv.

Libraries are not allowed to change ABI without changing binary package name. And for libraries built from such a core package as gcc, ABIs should be enforced at package build time to avoid such regressions.

This regression was overlooked at the time of gcc SRU because the autopkgtests for gcc uploads are special-cased to not test all reverse-dependencies; so it's incumbent on gcc to properly enforce ABI stability.

Steve Langasek (vorlon)
Changed in gcc-10 (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Critical
tags: added: regression-update
tags: added: fr-844
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

lowering exaggerated severity. No, ABI stability was not impacted besides for libphobos.

Changed in gcc-10 (Ubuntu):
importance: Critical → High
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in gcc-10 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Matthias Klose (doko)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Robie Basak (racb) wrote :

> Regression potential: low, no-change rebuilds with the updated GCC 10.3.

Won't this break any users who have built their own binaries against libgphobos1?

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote : Re: [Bug 1901080] Re: libgphobos1: ABI breakage in SRU

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 12:22:52PM -0000, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Regression potential: low, no-change rebuilds with the updated GCC
> 10.3.

> Won't this break any users who have built their own binaries against
> libgphobos1?

Yes, it will.

A proper fix for this must include upgrade handling. There are two ways to
accomplish this:

 - new libgphobos1 declares versioned Breaks: against the complete list of
   reverse-dependencies that use the old ABI; or
 - package shipping libgphobos.so.1 gets a new name such as libgphobos1final
   or libgphobos1stable or libgphobos1abi or something

I prefer the latter over the former for aesthetic reasons (including the
fact that it handles out-of-archive packages). But given the overall small
number of packages using this library (13 reverse-dependencies in focal, and
the problem went unreported by users, it was only picked up via
autopkgtests) I think the former would be acceptable in this case.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

So how should we proceed now? I see a set of no-change rebuilds from Matthias in the queue, but if we'd go with the second solution Steve mentioned, those will have to be rebuilt once again, right? I like the idea of us handling out-of-archive binaries, but I also don't know what the general policy is for such situations.

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

- do the no-change rebuilds
- then re-upload gcc-10 with the added breaks

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted a7xpg into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/a7xpg/0.11.dfsg1-10build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in a7xpg (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
Changed in dub (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted dub into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dub/1.19.0-1build2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in dustmite (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted dustmite into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dustmite/0~20170126.e95dff8-3build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in gunroar (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gunroar into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gunroar/0.15.dfsg1-9build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ii-esu (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ii-esu into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ii-esu/1.0a.dfsg1-8build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in mu-cade (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mu-cade into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mu-cade/0.11.dfsg1-12build4.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in parsec47 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted parsec47 into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/parsec47/0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in projectl (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted projectl into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/projectl/1.001.dfsg1-9build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in tatan (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted tatan into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tatan/1.0.dfsg1-8build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted titanion into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/titanion/0.3.dfsg1-7build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in titanion (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted torus-trooper into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torus-trooper/0.22.dfsg1-12build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in torus-trooper (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in tumiki-fighters (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted tumiki-fighters into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tumiki-fighters/0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in val-and-rick (Ubuntu Focal):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Steve, or anyone else affected,

Accepted val-and-rick into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/val-and-rick/0.1a.dfsg1-6build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

checked the dub package and one of the games, that these are working.

Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

I also confirm that the autopkgtest for the new version of dub, the only package with tests, passes.

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/dub/focal/amd64
etc...

Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote : [mu-cade/focal] verification still needed

The fix for this bug has been awaiting testing feedback in the -proposed repository for focal for more than 90 days. Please test this fix and update the bug appropriately with the results. In the event that the fix for this bug is still not verified 15 days from now, the package will be removed from the -proposed repository.

tags: added: removal-candidate
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Proposed package removed from archive

The version of a7xpg in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

tags: removed: verification-needed-focal
Changed in a7xpg (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
tags: removed: verification-needed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of dub in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in dub (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of dustmite in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in dustmite (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of gunroar in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in gunroar (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of ii-esu in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in ii-esu (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of mu-cade in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in mu-cade (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of parsec47 in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in parsec47 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of projectl in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in projectl (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of tatan in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in tatan (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of titanion in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in titanion (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of torus-trooper in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in torus-trooper (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of tumiki-fighters in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in tumiki-fighters (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

The version of val-and-rick in the proposed pocket of Focal that was purported to fix this bug report has been removed because the bugs that were to be fixed by the upload were not verified in a timely (105 days) fashion.

Changed in val-and-rick (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Won't Fix
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

As per my discussion with Steve, I will try to resurrect those back into -proposed and then look into releasing them to focal-updates on Monday.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Those should now be back in focal-proposed. Let's mark them verification-done, as per discussion and comment #20.

Changed in val-and-rick (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in a7xpg (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in dub (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in dustmite (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in gunroar (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in ii-esu (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in mu-cade (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in parsec47 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in projectl (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in tatan (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in titanion (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in torus-trooper (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
Changed in tumiki-fighters (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Won't Fix → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-done verification-done-focal
tags: removed: removal-candidate
Revision history for this message
Chris Halse Rogers (raof) wrote :

Łukasz, are you still planning on releasing these to focal-updates? They've dep-waited on ppc64el, but they always did, so they look releasable?

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package dub - 1.19.0-1build2.1

---------------
dub (1.19.0-1build2.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:24 +0200

Changed in dub (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package torus-trooper - 0.22.dfsg1-12build3.1

---------------
torus-trooper (0.22.dfsg1-12build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:07 +0200

Changed in torus-trooper (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package mu-cade - 0.11.dfsg1-12build4.1

---------------
mu-cade (0.11.dfsg1-12build4.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:16 +0200

Changed in mu-cade (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package projectl - 1.001.dfsg1-9build3.1

---------------
projectl (1.001.dfsg1-9build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:12 +0200

Changed in projectl (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package gunroar - 0.15.dfsg1-9build3.1

---------------
gunroar (0.15.dfsg1-9build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:20 +0200

Changed in gunroar (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package val-and-rick - 0.1a.dfsg1-6build3.1

---------------
val-and-rick (0.1a.dfsg1-6build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:03 +0200

Changed in val-and-rick (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ii-esu - 1.0a.dfsg1-8build3.1

---------------
ii-esu (1.0a.dfsg1-8build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:18 +0200

Changed in ii-esu (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package tumiki-fighters - 0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1

---------------
tumiki-fighters (0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:05 +0200

Changed in tumiki-fighters (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package titanion - 0.3.dfsg1-7build3.1

---------------
titanion (0.3.dfsg1-7build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:09 +0200

Changed in titanion (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package dustmite - 0~20170126.e95dff8-3build3.1

---------------
dustmite (0~20170126.e95dff8-3build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:22 +0200

Changed in dustmite (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package parsec47 - 0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1

---------------
parsec47 (0.2.dfsg1-9build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:14 +0200

Changed in parsec47 (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package tatan - 1.0.dfsg1-8build3.1

---------------
tatan (1.0.dfsg1-8build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:11 +0200

Changed in tatan (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package a7xpg - 0.11.dfsg1-10build3.1

---------------
a7xpg (0.11.dfsg1-10build3.1) focal; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #1901080: No-change rebuild, building with GCC 10.3.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:54:01 +0200

Changed in a7xpg (Ubuntu Focal):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Update Released

The verification of the Stable Release Update for dub has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.