Comment 17 for bug 1853200
Revision history for this message
| Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) wrote | #17 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
9199653
demo site
(Get the code!)
Oh so you seem to have a combination of HW/FW/Kernel that gets along with it. But for e.g. a Hosting environment please be aware of the "SMT vulnerable" unless you don't have SMT disabled anyway.
Since different systems (HW/FW/Kernel) will behave differently I think this issue isn't resolved yet @Nobuto.
@Security please let us know what your plan is on that - backporting the named types with the features removed to qemu/libvirt or did this change overall.