xchat-gnome auto-joins channels before identifying with nickserv
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Hundred Papercuts |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
| XChat-GNOME |
New
|
Low
|
|||
| xchat-gnome (Ubuntu) |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: xchat-gnome
When starting xchat-gnome, if the user has a nickserv password saved, the program autojoins channels before identifying the username.
Example:
-NickServ- This nickname is registered. Please choose a different nickname, or identify via /msg NickServ identify <password>.
Found your IP: [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Unknown MODE flag
#python :Cannot join channel (+r) - you need to be identified with services
-NickServ- You are now identified for pionar.
It should message nickserv before trying to join channels.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: xchat-gnome 1:0.26.1-1ubuntu3
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Oct 16 01:04:37 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: xchat-gnome
| Greg Bair (gregbair) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in hundredpapercuts: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Vish (vish) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in hundredpapercuts: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Incomplete |
| Chris Wilson (notgary-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #3 |
| Vish (vish) wrote | #4 |
| Changed in hundredpapercuts: | |
| status: | Incomplete → Invalid |
| Changed in xchat-gnome (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Vish (vish) wrote | #5 |
| Changed in xchat-gnome (Ubuntu): | |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
| status: | Confirmed → Triaged |
| Changed in xchat-gnome: | |
| importance: | Unknown → Low |
| status: | Unknown → New |
| Gabriele Vivinetto (gabriele.vivinetto) wrote | #6 |
We dont install xchat-gnome by default nor do I see it listed in the Software Center "Featured Apps"..
Am I missing something here, any reason this was included as a papercut?