I found this behaviour extremely annoying, but I cannot ever remember this bug on 80/90's HP, or Sun workstations.
Maybe that's because those companies, or the sysadmins mapped the arrow keys to something else.
If vim_tiny has to be kept, can I suggest doing 2 things....
1. Mapping arrow keys to something less annoying.
2. Including full full vi help in the ":help" command.
my immediate response was to look up help.
the help I found there was confusing.
Another option would be to map arrow keys to nothing at all!
Another hint that this is a bug people have resolved is here: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sgi/faq/apps/section-24.html
This suggests that at least for original vi, arrow mappings were available, but on slow terminals exhimited same behaviour as Ubuntu.
I found this behaviour extremely annoying, but I cannot ever remember this bug on 80/90's HP, or Sun workstations.
Maybe that's because those companies, or the sysadmins mapped the arrow keys to something else.
If vim_tiny has to be kept, can I suggest doing 2 things....
1. Mapping arrow keys to something less annoying.
2. Including full full vi help in the ":help" command.
my immediate response was to look up help.
the help I found there was confusing.
An example of mapping arrow keys is here: hea-www. harvard. edu/~fine/ Tech/vi. html
http://
Another option would be to map arrow keys to nothing at all!
Another hint that this is a bug people have resolved is here: www.faqs. org/faqs/ sgi/faq/ apps/section- 24.html
http://
This suggests that at least for original vi, arrow mappings were available, but on slow terminals exhimited same behaviour as Ubuntu.