interrupted upgrade should automatically resume

Thanks for your bugreport.

when regular updates get interrupted with ubuntu 8.04 then update-manager should be able to repair this by showing a icon in the gnome-panel. The same for release-upgrades, however this is of course tricky if there is no X working anymore :/

do you have to make thsi:

sistem admin package menager here in packaje manager you have to correct the break pakage.

good luck

Thank you

________________________________
Da: Juan Sebastian Cobaleda Cano <email address hidden>
A: <email address hidden>
Inviato: Venerdì 12 dicembre 2008, 23:10:56
Oggetto: [Bug 252068] Re: interrupted upgrade should automatically resume

do you have to make thsi:

sistem admin package menager here in packaje manager you have to
correct the break pakage.

good luck

** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Fix Released

--
interrupted upgrade should automatically resume
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252068
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.

The user Juan Sebastian Cobaleda Cano is a troll, or something. We, in the Ubuntu-Co Team are cheking all his changes in Launchpad. Sorry for the problems.

Bug 900884 has been marked as duplicate of this one, but let's NOT confuse two very different issues:

ONE THING is you try to upgrade, something goes wrong, and you decide not to retry immediately. Later, you should be able to resume the process. I think this is what was addressed in this report

ANOTHER THING is you try to upgrade, and you hit some very temporary error such as a network failure while downloading packages: in this case, the upgrade tool just gives an error message and exit. Instead, it should give an option to retry, without restarting from scratch. I mean like when you are copying a bunch of files and one fails: you are always given the option to retry or skip. Here skipping doesn't make sense, but retrying does. THIS is what 900884 was about.

I'm talking about a release upgrade (it's not clear if this was the case for the original report).

By the way, importance "wishlist" is ridiculous. Having to abort a procedure just because of a minor temporary failure like a network failure is unacceptable.