unity-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_bit_lock()

Bug #1285005 reported by M.C. Botha
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

None

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: unity-settings-daemon 14.04.0+14.04.20140221.1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-12.32-generic 3.13.4
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-12-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.13.2-0ubuntu5
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Feb 26 08:45:13 2014
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-26 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Alpha i386 (20140224)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon/unity-settings-daemon
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_ZA:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=en_ZA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/false
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xb6ef94d0 <g_bit_lock+64>: lock bts %ebp,(%esi)
 PC (0xb6ef94d0) ok
 source "%ebp" ok
 destination "(%esi)" (0x00000010) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: unity-settings-daemon
StacktraceTop:
 g_bit_lock () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_n_children () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 g_variant_iter_init () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/unity-settings-daemon-1.0/libkeyboard.so
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__PARAM () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: unity-settings-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in g_bit_lock()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
M.C. Botha (mcbotha) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1284521, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.