do-partial-upgrade assert failure: python3: ../../src/xcb_io.c:274: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.

Bug #1292213 reported by Stephen
14
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Medium
Shafi Ur Rehman

Bug Description

Doing a partial upgrade

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.216.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-17.37-generic 3.13.6
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-17-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.13.3-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: python3: ../../src/xcb_io.c:274: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.
CrashDB: ubuntu
Date: Thu Mar 13 16:43:15 2014
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/ubuntu-release-upgrader/do-partial-upgrade
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-14 (27 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Alpha i386 (20140201)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.4
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/lib/ubuntu-release-upgrader/do-partial-upgrade --frontend=DistUpgradeViewGtk3
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 LANGUAGE=en_CA:en
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
StacktraceTop:
 __assert_fail_base (fmt=0xb7697ff4 "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n", assertion=assertion@entry=0xb6284a68 "!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost", file=file@entry=0xb62848db "../../src/xcb_io.c", line=line@entry=274, function=function@entry=0xb6284cf2 "poll_for_event") at assert.c:92
 __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0xb6284a68 "!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost", file=0xb62848db "../../src/xcb_io.c", line=274, function=0xb6284cf2 "poll_for_event") at assert.c:101
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
 _XEventsQueued () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
Title: do-partial-upgrade assert failure: python3: ../../src/xcb_io.c:274: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
Stephen (moondoggy2) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote :

StacktraceTop:
 __assert_fail_base (fmt=0xb7697ff4 "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n", assertion=assertion@entry=0xb6284a68 "!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost", file=file@entry=0xb62848db "../../src/xcb_io.c", line=line@entry=274, function=function@entry=0xb6284cf2 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.14003> "poll_for_event") at assert.c:92
 __GI___assert_fail (assertion=assertion@entry=0xb6284a68 "!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost", file=file@entry=0xb62848db "../../src/xcb_io.c", line=line@entry=274, function=function@entry=0xb6284cf2 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.14003> "poll_for_event") at assert.c:101
 poll_for_event (dpy=dpy@entry=0x941a388) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:271
 poll_for_response (dpy=dpy@entry=0x941a388) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:289
 _XEventsQueued (dpy=dpy@entry=0x941a388, mode=mode@entry=2) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:363

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stacktrace.txt
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : StacktraceSource.txt
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : ThreadStacktrace.txt
Changed in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
Revision history for this message
Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) wrote : Bug is not a security issue

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private Security → Public
Changed in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Shafi Ur Rehman (shafi-khattak66)
status: New → Confirmed
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.