ubuntu-desktop should depend on ubuntu-standard should depend on ubuntu-minimal
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Low
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Background: I like aptitude, especially its ability to flag some packages as "automatically installed" (as the result a dependencies). Those packages are proposed for removal as soon as no "manually installed" package depend on them.
So the first thing I do after installing a fresh Ubuntu is to
* install aptitude
* mark all packages as "automatically installed"
* (this is result in a proposal to remove all packages, which is logical)
* mark back a minimal number of packages as "manually installed" so that all packages are kept
After a fresh install of raring ringtail (beta), here are the package that need to be marked as "manually installled"
* grub-efi
* libreoffice-
* linux-generic
* ubuntu-desktop
* ubuntu-minimal
* ubuntu-standard
* ubuntu-
* hyphen-en-us
* mythes-en-us
* openoffice.
* language-
* thunderbird-
* flashplugin-
It seems to me that 1/ there are too much of them, and 2/ some of them might even not need to be there (openoffice??).
Namely, why does ubuntu-desktop not depend on ubuntu-minimal and ubuntu-standard?
Why does ubuntu-minimal not depend on linux-generic?
Why does flashplugin-
Why does grub-efi not depend on other grub-related packages (which are already "pulled" by another package)?
I understand that my use case is probably quite rare.
However, I think it would be a better design in general to have the initial dependency graph cleaner, i.e. with a minimal number of sources.
summary: |
- clean-up dependecy graph + ubuntu-desktop should depend on ubuntu-standard should depend on ubuntu- + minimal |
Changed in ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Low |
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.