synergyc assert failure: synergyc: /build/buildd/synergy-1.3.6/lib/arch/CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:289: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.

Bug #837864 reported by Sam Bartle
0
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
synergy (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

this happens on ever login after upgrade to 11.10 in order to install some new packages for this version

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: synergy 1.3.6-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-9.14-generic-pae 3.0.3
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-9-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: synergyc: /build/buildd/synergy-1.3.6/lib/arch/CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:289: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
Date: Wed Aug 31 08:05:46 2011
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/synergyc
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/synergyc medion8800
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: synergy
StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 raise () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*) ()
Title: synergyc assert failure: synergyc: /build/buildd/synergy-1.3.6/lib/arch/CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:289: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-08-31 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Sam Bartle (sambartle) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #746995, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.