Ubuntu
synergy package

synergys assert failure: synergys: /build/buildd/synergy-1.3.6/lib/arch/CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:289: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.

Bug #772510 reported by Gary Salisbury
0
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
synergy (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: synergy

Synergy crashes after 10.10 to 11.04 upgrade

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: synergy 1.3.6-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic-pae 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic-pae i686
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: synergys: /build/buildd/synergy-1.3.6/lib/arch/CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:289: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
Date: Thu Apr 28 18:25:25 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/synergys
ProcCmdline: synergys -f --config /etc/synergy.conf
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_ZA:en
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=C
 LC_MESSAGES=en_ZA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: synergy
StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 raise () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*) ()
Title: synergys assert failure: synergys: /build/buildd/synergy-1.3.6/lib/arch/CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:289: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-27 (1 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
Gary Salisbury (gary-r-salisbury) wrote :

Maybe ATI driver issue

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #732684, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.