synergys assert failure: synergys: CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:286: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.

Bug #648178 reported by Guigui
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
synergy (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: synergy

Synergys crashes, don't really know why...

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: synergy 1.3.1-6ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: synergys: CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:286: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Sun Sep 26 02:28:14 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/synergys
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/synergys -f --config .quicksynergy/synergy.conf
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=fr_FR.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: synergy
StacktraceTop:
 __kernel_vsyscall ()
 raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
Title: synergys assert failure: synergys: CArchMultithreadPosix.cpp:286: virtual void CArchMultithreadPosix::closeMutex(CArchMutexImpl*): Assertion `status == 0' failed.
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video

Revision history for this message
Guigui (guigui) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Guigui (guigui) wrote :

I have synergys started after login on gnome. Each time, after a few minutes, it get this report, but it is still working, and works all the time the computer is powered...

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #420088, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.