Ubuntu
software-properties package

software-properties-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV

Bug #914617 reported by Daktyl198 on 2012-01-11

18

This bug affects 2 people

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	software-properties (Ubuntu)	Confirmed	Medium	Unassigned

Bug Description

Software Sources closed after trying to remove a ppa

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: software-properties-gtk 0.82
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Jan 11 02:20:49 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/software-properties-gtk
SegvAnalysis:
Segfault happened at: 0x7fcb141092e8: movzwl (%rbx),%eax
PC (0x7fcb141092e8) ok
source "(%rbx)" (0x00000000) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
destination "%eax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: software-properties
StacktraceTop:
?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
Title: software-properties-gtk crashed with SIGSEGV
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-12-24 (18 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Daktyl198 (daktyl198) wrote on 2012-01-11:

#1

Dependencies.txt Edit (5.0 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Disassembly.txt Edit (601 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcEnviron.txt Edit (141 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcMaps.txt Edit (53.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcStatus.txt Edit (816 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Registers.txt Edit (647 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Stacktrace.txt Edit (3.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (5.9 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-01-11:

#2

StacktraceTop:
gtk_tree_selection_real_select_node (selection=<optimized out>, tree=0x0, node=0x0, select=<optimized out>) at /build/buildd/gtk+3.0-3.3.6/./gtk/gtktreeselection.c:1640
_gtk_tree_selection_internal_select_node (selection=0x3273450, node=0x0, tree=0x0, path=0x35a3080, mode=<optimized out>, override_browse_mode=<optimized out>) at /build/buildd/gtk+3.0-3.3.6/./gtk/gtktreeselection.c:1543
gtk_tree_view_real_toggle_cursor_row (tree_view=0x32563a0) at /build/buildd/gtk+3.0-3.3.6/./gtk/gtktreeview.c:10775
gtk_tree_view_button_press (widget=0x32563a0, event=0x35aeaa0) at /build/buildd/gtk+3.0-3.3.6/./gtk/gtktreeview.c:3103
_gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED (closure=0x2871f20, return_value=0x7fff325c6c50, n_param_values=<optimized out>, param_values=0x35ae4f0, invocation_hint=<optimized out>, marshal_data=<optimized out>) at /build/buildd/gtk+3.0-3.3.6/./gtk/gtkmarshalers.c:85

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-01-11: Stacktrace.txt

#3

Stacktrace.txt Edit (10.6 KiB, text/plain)

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-01-11: ThreadStacktrace.txt

#4

ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (17.6 KiB, text/plain)

Changed in software-properties (Ubuntu):
importance:	Undecided → Medium
tags:	removed: need-amd64-retrace

Revision history for this message

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote on 2012-01-16:

#5

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in software-properties (Ubuntu):
status:	New → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Robert Roth (evfool) wrote on 2012-05-18:

#6

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility:

private → public

Report a bug

This report contains Public information

Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Bug #917412

You are

Subscribing...

Edit bug mail

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.