Ubuntu
shotwell package

shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in editing_host_page_display_copy_of(): "_tmp1_ != NULL"

Bug #861870 reported by Till Kamppeter on 2011-09-28

18

This bug affects 3 people

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	shotwell (Ubuntu)	Confirmed	Medium	Unassigned

Bug Description

Removed old photos which I have viewed with shotwell simply via command line ("rm -rf ..."), to make space for an upgrade to Oneiric on my Asus eeePC 900. After completing the upgrade I opened shotwell. Old thumbnails shortly appeared, disappeared, clicked on "Missing Files", froze for some time, crash.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: shotwell 0.11.2-0ubuntu1 [modified: usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled]
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic-pae 3.0.4
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Sep 28 23:50:36 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/shotwell
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release i386 (20101007)
ProcCmdline: shotwell
ProcEnviron:
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: shotwell
StacktraceTop:
__kernel_vsyscall ()
raise () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
abort () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
g_assertion_message () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
g_assertion_message_expr () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fax floppy fuse lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare tape video
XsessionErrors:
(update-notifier:1860): libgdu-WARNING **: Couldn't call GetAll() to get properties for /org/freedesktop/UDisks/devices/sdc: Method "GetAll" with signature "s" on interface "org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" doesn't exist
(nautilus:1478): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_x >= 0 && dest_x + dest_width <= dest->width' failed
(nautilus:1478): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `dest_x >= 0 && dest_x + dest_width <= dest->width' failed

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Till Kamppeter (till-kamppeter) wrote on 2011-09-28:

#1

Dependencies.txt Edit (4.3 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Disassembly.txt Edit (536 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcMaps.txt Edit (37.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcStatus.txt Edit (800 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Registers.txt Edit (466 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Stacktrace.txt Edit (2.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (6.4 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

visibility:

private → public

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2011-09-28:

#2

StacktraceTop:
g_assertion_message (domain=0x0, file=0x83b0c01 "i686-linux-gnu/PhotoPage.c", line=4621, func=0x83b1b80 "editing_host_page_display_copy_of", message=<optimized out>) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.0/./glib/gtestutils.c:1425
g_assertion_message_expr (domain=0x0, file=0x83b0c01 "i686-linux-gnu/PhotoPage.c", line=4621, func=0x83b1b80 "editing_host_page_display_copy_of", expr=0x83b0f83 "_tmp1_ != NULL") at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.30.0/./glib/gtestutils.c:1436
editing_host_page_display_copy_of (self=0xa6dc0b0, controller=0xa73b1a8, starting_photo=0xa4bcc48) at i686-linux-gnu/PhotoPage.c:4621
library_photo_page_display_for_collection (self=0xa6dc0b0, return_page=0xa7de000, photo=0xa4bcc48, view=0x0) at i686-linux-gnu/PhotoPage.c:9649
library_window_switch_to_photo_page (self=0xa72c018, controller=0xa7de000, current=0xa4bcc48) at i686-linux-gnu/library/LibraryWindow.c:4528

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2011-09-28: Stacktrace.txt

#3

Stacktrace.txt Edit (11.6 KiB, text/plain)

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2011-09-28: ThreadStacktrace.txt

#4

ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (19.9 KiB, text/plain)

Changed in shotwell (Ubuntu):
importance:	Undecided → Medium
tags:	removed: need-i386-retrace

Revision history for this message

Clint Rogers (clinton-yorba) wrote on 2011-09-28: Re: shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()

#5

Hi, and thank you for taking time to report this to us. I've filed a bug on our side; please see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4199.

Does this happen every time you open Shotwell now, or did it only happen once? Also, if you feel comfortable doing so, can you send us a copy of your photo database? (You can find it in your home directory in .shotwell/data/).

Revision history for this message

Till Kamppeter (till-kamppeter) wrote on 2011-09-28:

#6

It happened only once. After I reported this bug I opened Shotwell again and clicked on "Missing Files" again, thumbnails appeared, no crash happened. Then I have clicked "Mark All" and after that "Remove from library" in the "Edit" menu, to get rid of the stale photo entries. Probably I have also removed the cause of the crash with that. Should I still send my photo database?

Revision history for this message

Clint Rogers (clinton-yorba) wrote on 2011-09-28:

#7

If the crash is no longer occurring, this might not be needed.

Between the deletion and the assertion I spotted in Stacktrace.txt, I believe we have enough clues to investigate further at this point.

In the meantime, if you do happen to perform roughly the same sequence of actions (delete images via the filesystem, launch Shotwell, have it die when trying to look at the missing photo page) and get the same crash, please let us know and have a copy of the db at that point.

Revision history for this message

Till Kamppeter (till-kamppeter) wrote on 2011-09-29:

#8

I have done the same steps again, on the same computer, and it did not crash this time.

Sebastien Bacher (seb128) on 2011-10-18

summary:

- shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in __kernel_vsyscall()
+ shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in editing_host_page_display_copy_of():
+ "_tmp1_ != NULL"

Revision history for this message

dino99 (9d9) wrote on 2016-01-27:

#9

This version has expired long time ago, and is no more supported

Changed in shotwell (Ubuntu):
status:	New → Invalid

Revision history for this message

PeterPall (peterpall) wrote on 2016-08-17:

#10

Just got this problem with Ubuntu Yakkety. At least apport tells me that the crash I get is this problem. All I have to do in order to make shotwell crash is to open it (it will use 100% of one CPU and output warnings apparently about having problems with thumbnailing videos) and wait for a few hours.

Changed in shotwell (Ubuntu):
status:	Invalid → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Jens Georg (yg-jensge) wrote on 2016-08-18:

#11

That is a completely different crash to the inital report

Revision history for this message

Jens Georg (yg-jensge) wrote on 2016-08-18:

#12

Er sorry, mixed up launchpad reports

Report a bug

This report contains Public information

Everyone can see this information.

You are

Subscribing...

Edit bug mail

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Add attachment

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.