Feature request: allow use of update-secureboot-policy for non-DKMS modules
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
shim-signed (Ubuntu) |
Triaged
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Already discussed by e-mail/IRC with Mathieu. We (the VirtualBox team) would like to call update-
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: shim-signed 1.39+15+
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
.proc.sys.
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.405
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue May 14 16:56:38 2019
EFITables:
Mai 13 11:05:20 michael-
Mai 13 11:05:20 michael-
Mai 13 11:05:20 michael-
Mai 13 11:05:20 michael-
Mai 13 11:05:21 michael-
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-06-12 (335 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180426)
SecureBoot: 6 0 0 0 1
SourcePackage: shim-signed
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2019-03-26 (49 days ago)
Changed in shim-signed (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Triaged |
importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
By the way, I know that we could get this by just using DKMS for our modules (and we could still do that if we absolutely had to), but we prefer not to. The reason for this is that not all distributions that we target support DKMS, so we still need to provide our home-grown DKMS replacement. We used to support DKMS as well, but because DKMS occasionally went wrong on users's systems, often enough to be cause us additional support work, we decided to drop it.