snapper.so not included into samba-vfs-modules

Bug #1572950 reported by luigi.mantellini@gmail.com
32
This bug affects 5 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
samba (Debian)
Fix Released
Unknown
samba (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Hi,

the snapper.so vfs module is still not included into samba-vfs-module. This module is useful to manage btrfs snapshot via snapper utility.

Best regards,

luigi

Revision history for this message
luigi.mantellini@gmail.com (comio) wrote :

Please compile samba with dbus support (you need to add libdbus-1-dev package to enable this).

best regards,

luigi

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in samba (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Etienne CHAMPETIER (champtar) wrote :

BTW you are shipping the man page but not the module

Revision history for this message
Etienne CHAMPETIER (champtar) wrote :
Revision history for this message
DocMAX (docmax) wrote :

Any news? When will this be done?

Changed in samba (Debian):
status: Unknown → New
Revision history for this message
Christian Ehrhardt  (paelzer) wrote :

Hi Etienne and DocMax,
the recently proposed patch [1] seems fine to me - no component mismatch at least.

Yet for essentially feature enablement we'd prefer to add no Delta to Debian. So this will likely be picked up on the merge after Debian integrated the change.

Also there you said "works perfectly fine, Version is 4.3.6+dfsg-1".
Does that mean it is fixed since 4.3.6? I checked this and various other newer versions but didn't see a snapper.so in any of them yet.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=804781;filename=samba-enable-snapper;msg=22

Changed in samba (Debian):
status: New → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
DocMAX (docmax) wrote :

When can i expect the fix to be in ubuntu 16.04 LTS?

Revision history for this message
Joshua Powers (powersj) wrote :

DocMax,

Thanks for the question. Could respond to paelzer's query in #6 as it would help clarify if/how this is necessary for samba in Xenial.

Thanks!

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.