Ubuntu
rasmol package

rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea()

Bug #915228 reported by Sasa Paporovic on 2012-01-12

18

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	RasMol	New	Undecided	Unassigned
	rasmol (Ubuntu)	Confirmed	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

I have just started the classic version of RasMol on Ubuntu12.04 64bit updated to 12.1.2012.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: rasmol 2.7.5-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-8.14-generic 3.2.0
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-8-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Thu Jan 12 10:46:37 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/rasmol/rasmol.32
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/rasmol/rasmol.32
SegvAnalysis:
Segfault happened at: 0x7fe25e6876a2 <XCopyArea+66>: cmpq $0x0,0x18(%r13)
PC (0x7fe25e6876a2) ok
source "$0x0" ok
destination "0x18(%r13)" (0x00000018) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: rasmol
StacktraceTop:
XCopyArea () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
Title: rasmol.32 crashed with SIGSEGV in XCopyArea()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2011-12-31 (11 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom debian-tor dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Sasa Paporovic (melchiaros) wrote on 2012-01-12:

#1

CoreDump.gz Edit (52.0 KiB, application/x-gzip)
Dependencies.txt Edit (2.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Disassembly.txt Edit (946 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcEnviron.txt Edit (143 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcMaps.txt Edit (6.9 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ProcStatus.txt Edit (818 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Registers.txt Edit (664 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Stacktrace.txt Edit (1.4 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (1.4 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")

visibility:

private → public

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-01-12:

#2

StacktraceTop:
XCopyArea (dpy=0xfc7010, src_drawable=0, dst_drawable=0, gc=0x0, src_x=0, src_y=0, width=16, height=16, dst_x=-64, dst_y=0) at ../../src/CopyArea.c:49
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-01-12: Stacktrace.txt

#3

Stacktrace.txt Edit (1.4 KiB, text/plain)

Revision history for this message

Apport retracing service (apport) wrote on 2012-01-12: ThreadStacktrace.txt

#4

ThreadStacktrace.txt Edit (1.4 KiB, text/plain)

tags:	added: apport-failed-retrace
tags:	removed: need-amd64-retrace

Revision history for this message

Hans Joachim Desserud (hjd) wrote on 2012-01-15:

#5

I get the same segfault when attempting to start rasmol-classic. Note that it doesn't seem to affect rasmol nor rasmol-gtk.

Changed in rasmol (Ubuntu):
status:	New → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Sasa Paporovic (melchiaros) wrote on 2013-04-01:

#6

Seen on quantal. I add the tag for.

tags:

added: quantal

Revision history for this message

Sasa Paporovic (melchiaros) wrote on 2013-04-01:

#7

This also happends with the gtk version

Revision history for this message

Sasa Paporovic (melchiaros) wrote on 2013-04-01:

#8

The upstream report could be found at:

https://sourceforge.net/p/openrasmol/bugs/10/

Revision history for this message

Sasa Paporovic (melchiaros) wrote on 2013-04-01:

#9

hjd,

may be it makes sense to leafe a comment on the upstream tracker.

You know more noise generate sometimes more attention(not the nice style).

Report a bug

This report contains Public information

Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Bug #914919

You are

Subscribing...

Edit bug mail

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.