Ubuntu
powertop package

Explain the implications of suggested tweaks

Bug #268267 reported by Scott Wegner
10
This bug affects 2 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
powertop (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: powertop

Powertop seems to be a very useful tool for analyzing power usage and suggesting easy system tweaks to decrease power use. However, it is a little dangerous in that root-level system tweaks are only a hot-key away, with no real explanation of what's going on.

I think it would be useful if powertop also offered a short explanation of what each of the suggested tweaks would do, and give any specific warning. Some examples:
-- I saw one suggestion on my system that recommended that I disable HAL polling my cdrom. That's fine for now, but what if I insert a CD later? Will I be able to use the CD? Will this setting revert at reboot?
-- There was another suggestion that I increase the dirty writeback interval from 0.30 seconds to 15 seconds. This should send a warning to the user, that this can cause high risk of data corruption in a power outage.

Revision history for this message
jjos (jbenjos) wrote :

PowerTop can be a little more clear on what drawbacks, if any, there are is in a given action.

Changed in powertop:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Scott Wegner (swegner) wrote :

Although perhaps beyond the scope of the utility, it may also be useful to have a history of actions taken, and also the option to "undo" a given tweak. This would require backing-up the previous value as well.

Revision history for this message
Virgil Brummond (uraharakisuke153) wrote :

I agree with the "undo" ability, though I believe most tweaks are not permanent and revert on reboot. Also, I think it would be nice if we had a Power Initive where us as a community puts forward a bit of effort and logs into improving power management. This would be good for open source as a whole.

Revision history for this message
Christoph Buchner (bilderbuchi) wrote :

I agree, this needs more information.
On one machine I have ~15 bad tunables, but I don't dare to switch on most of them, because I have no idea about the (negative) consequences, what I could break (or if the changes are harmless), if they revert on boot, what kind of power savings they bring (maybe difficult to predict, or how to get back if they break the system.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.