Ubuntu
nspluginwrapper package

npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_newv()

Bug #201360 reported by kallek
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #141613: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV. Edit Remove
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
Incomplete
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper

8.04
Hardy Heron, 64-bit
I cannot find npviewer in Synaptic, nor with apt-cache policy ... .
It crashed when I logged in to my igoogle account, I did not have any flash running (as far as i know). But, I have not noticed any effect of the crash.

ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Mar 12 06:21:10 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin
NonfreeKernelModules: cdrom
Package: nspluginwrapper 0.9.91.5-1ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: amd64
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer.bin --plugin /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so --connection /org/wrapper/NSPlugins/libflashplayer.so/6405-1
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: nspluginwrapper
StacktraceTop:
 g_object_newv () from /usr/lib32/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new_valist () from /usr/lib32/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new () from /usr/lib32/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 gdk_pixbuf_new_from_data ()
 gdk_pixbuf_new () from /usr/lib32/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
Title: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_newv()
Uname: Linux 2.6.24-12-generic x86_64
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip floppy fuse lpadmin plugdev video

Revision history for this message
kallek (hturesson) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic stack trace

StacktraceTop:?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Symbolic threaded stack trace
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stack trace with source code
Revision history for this message
Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote :

Thanks for your bug report. Please try to obtain a backtrace http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and attach the file to the bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem.

Changed in nspluginwrapper:
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
kallek (hturesson) wrote : Re: [Bug 201360] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_newv()
  • unnamed Edit (1.6 KiB, text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1)

I have not been able to consistently reproduce the crash, although
nsplugnspluginwrapper has crashed a few times more, but in different
situations.

Thanks,
hjalmar

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Pedro Villavicencio <email address hidden>
wrote:

> Thanks for your bug report. Please try to obtain a backtrace
> http://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash and attach the file to the
> bug report. This will greatly help us in tracking down your problem.
>
> ** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
>
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12604416/CoreDump.gz
>
> ** Changed in: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => Medium
> Status: New => Incomplete
>
> ** Visibility changed to: Public
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_newv()
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201360
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>

--
Program in Neuroscience
Department of Psychology
Green Hall
Princeton University
Princeton NJ 08540
USA

Revision history for this message
Kristoffer Paro (kristoffer-paro) wrote :

The same problem seems to occur to me as well. Flash stops working at random intervals and only displays a gray box. I am running Hardy AMD64.

Revision history for this message
Hew (hew) wrote :

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 178038, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.