Unable to connect to OpenVPN endpoint
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NetworkManager |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
network-manager (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
network-manager-openvpn (Ubuntu) |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Hello,
I am facing some problems getting OpenVPN working through NetworkManager on Ubuntu 12.10. I am able to connect when using the 'regular' OpenVPN client and a config file, but not through NM with a similar config. From my investigations so far, it seems that the /sys/devices/
Best Regards
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: OpenVPN 2.2.1 x86_64-linux-gnu [SSL] [LZO2] [EPOLL] [PKCS11] [eurephia] [MH] [PF_INET6] [IPv6 payload 2
0110424-2 (2.2RC2)] built on Oct 8 2012
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: WARNING: Make sure you understand the semantics of --tls-remote before using it (see the man page).
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: NOTE: the current --script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: LZO compression initialized
Oct 25 13:38:22 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: Attempting to establish TCP connection with [AF_INET]
Oct 25 13:38:23 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: TCP connection established with [AF_INET]
Oct 25 13:38:23 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: TCPv4_CLIENT link local: [undef]
Oct 25 13:38:23 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: TCPv4_CLIENT link remote: [AF_INET]
Oct 25 13:38:23 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: [xxxx.xxxxx.xxxx] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: TUN/TAP device tap0 opened
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: /usr/lib/
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: WARNING: Failed running command (--up/--down): external program exited with error status: 1
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet nm-openvpn[2656]: Exiting
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:25 havet NetworkManager[
Oct 25 13:38:30 havet NetworkManager[
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: network-manager 0.9.6.0-0ubuntu7
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-17-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Oct 25 14:21:40 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
IfupdownConfig:
# interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Release amd64 (20121017.5)
IpRoute:
default via xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx dev wlan0 proto static
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/16 dev wlan0 scope link metric 1000
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx metric 9
NetworkManager.
[main]
NetworkingEnab
WirelessEnable
WWANEnabled=true
WimaxEnabled=true
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
XDG_RUNTIME_
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: network-manager
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
nmcli-con:
NAME UUID TYPE TIMESTAMP TIMESTAMP-REAL AUTOCONNECT READONLY DBUS-PATH
xxxxxxxx e371edb9-
xxxxxxx 1b0cae8c-
xxx.xxx.xxx 69939077-
Wired connection 1 aa1f264a-
nmcli-dev:
DEVICE TYPE STATE DBUS-PATH
wlan0 802-11-wireless connected /org/freedeskto
eth0 802-3-ethernet unavailable /org/freedeskto
nmcli-nm:
RUNNING VERSION STATE NET-ENABLED WIFI-HARDWARE WIFI WWAN-HARDWARE WWAN
running 0.9.6.0 connected enabled enabled enabled enabled disabled
Bug #1071745 is the same for Precise.
Upstream thread reference: http://
description: | updated |
tags: | added: precise |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
Could this be a duplicate of bug #777864?