mc should warn prior to attempting to copy a file >4 GB to vfat partition instead of crashing

Bug #78182 reported by Christoph Müller
14
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Midnight Commander
New
Unknown
mc (Ubuntu)
Confirmed
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: mc

reproduce:
copy a file larger than 4096MB onto a vfat partition

Revision history for this message
Christoph Müller (pisi) wrote :

I am aware of the fact, that vfat is unable to handle such large files.
Is it possible to check this before copying and present a warning to the user?

Revision history for this message
Daniel T Chen (crimsun) wrote :

Is this symptom still reproducible in 8.10 alpha?

Changed in mc:
importance: Undecided → Medium
status: New → Incomplete
importance: Medium → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Christoph Müller (pisi) wrote :

I'm sorry, but I do not have an 8.10 alpha installation available.
Is there someone elso who can check this?

Revision history for this message
Dimitrios Symeonidis (azimout) wrote :

setting back to new for now, and raising importance to low, this is not wishlist...

however, since vfat partitions have a maximum of 4GB, i don't see how this could be a vfat-specific problem...
i have no >4gb file to test, though... christoph, can you please elaborate?

Changed in mc:
importance: Wishlist → Low
status: Incomplete → New
Revision history for this message
Christoph Müller (pisi) wrote :

Dimitrios, I'm sorry, but I don't have a ubuntu installation available anymore.
You can easily create a large file using dd ...

Revision history for this message
rusivi2 (rusivi2-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Thank you for reporting this bug.

I agree with Daniel T Chen this is a wishlist. This is a request to "ignorance proof" the attempt to copy larger than limits of the FS. For example, implementing some FS copy checker script. This bug should be marked as this or triaged.

Revision history for this message
rusivi2 (rusivi2-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

Yury:

Is this bug still needed or should it be placed upstream?

Revision history for this message
Yury V. Zaytsev (zyv) wrote :

Hi!

I can't set the importance of the bugs for some reasons. Sure I don't need it. I've just forwarded it upstream. If you'd like to help me to triage bugs for mc just check if the are already reported upstream (in such a case link them to the report) and if not escalate them without asking ;-)

Z.

Changed in mc (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in mc:
status: Unknown → New
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.