Bug #207220 “[Upstream] cursor does not change to arrow hovering...” : Bugs : libreoffice package : Ubuntu

Revision history for this message

Chris Cheney (ccheney) wrote on 2008-03-26:

#1

Works for me just fine in openoffice.org 1:2.4.0~rc2-1ubuntu3. If you still have this problem then please attach the document where this issue can be seen. I tested in both Database and Word Processor and checkboxes on both switch from the text cursor to an arrow when I go over the checkbox.

Changed in openoffice.org:
status:	New → Incomplete

Revision history for this message

Christian González (droetker) wrote on 2008-03-26:

#2

Hm - funny.
Maybe it has to do with that document - it is read only.
(attached as .odt or here as link as .doc)

http://www.netzwerk-essstoerungen.at/kongress08/download/k08_registrationform.doc

Chris Cheney (ccheney) on 2008-03-26

Changed in openoffice.org:
status:	Incomplete → New

Revision history for this message

Chris Cheney (ccheney) wrote on 2008-07-23:

#3

The odt version doesn't open properly in either upstream 2.4.1 or 3.0m24. However saving the doc file back to odt makes it work fine. It appears it somehow got converted incorrectly in an old version of OpenOffice.org?

Changed in openoffice.org:
status:	New → Invalid

Revision history for this message

Chris Cheney (ccheney) wrote on 2008-07-23:

#4

Sorry, I forgot to verify with Ubuntu's version, so yes this bug still seems to exist and it seems to be ooo-build specific.

Thanks,

Chris Cheney

Changed in openoffice.org:
importance:	Undecided → Medium
status:	Invalid → Triaged

Revision history for this message

In Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #437569, Chris Cheney (ccheney) wrote on 2008-10-22:

#5

See this file:

http://www.netzwerk-essstoerungen.at/kongress08/download/k08_registrationform.doc

In ooo-build version hovering over the checkboxes doesn't change the cursor from the insert(?) cursor to the pointer like in official openoffice.org. Also the checkboxes look a lot different than they do in official openoffice.org and not really like checkboxes instead like "X" boxes.

Changed in openoffice:
importance:	Undecided → Unknown
status:	New → Unknown

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2008-10-22

Changed in openoffice:
status:	Unknown → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

In Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #437569, Mmeeks (mmeeks) wrote on 2008-10-22:

#6

This is down to Florian's sexy fields work, that substantially improves interop and field functionality. Try tabbing through that form, and filling it out when using up-stream's OO.o ;->

Revision history for this message

In Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #437569, Tbehrens (tbehrens) wrote on 2009-09-03:

#7

back to shared owner for re-eval.

Revision history for this message

In Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #437569, Pmladek (pmladek) wrote on 2009-10-05:

#8

The problem is still in OOo-3.1.1 => assigning to Cedric

Revision history for this message

penalvch (penalvch) wrote on 2011-05-18: Re: [ooo-build] cursor should change when hovering over checkbox

#9

Christian A. Reiter, the attached file did not seem to have a checkbox. As well, the hyperlink mentioned does not contain the file http://www.netzwerk-essstoerungen.at/kongress08/download/k08_registrationform.doc Could you please attach a file that demonstrates this problem?

Changed in openoffice.org (Ubuntu):
status:	Triaged → Incomplete

Revision history for this message

Christian González (droetker) wrote on 2011-05-18:

#10

test file Edit (9.5 KiB, application/msword)

Thats maybe because the part of the file name "kongress08" and k08_registrationform gives a hint that this bug was introduced in 2008 and now we have 2011 ;-)

Anyway - just create an empty file with writer, put a checkbox in it labeled "test" (with View->Toolbars->Form control).
The cursor changes to the standard arrow when hovering over the checkbox.
Now save the file as .doc, not as .odt, and reopen it.
Now the cursor refuses to change.

Reproduced with
LibreOffice 3.3.2
OOO330m19 (Build:202)
tag libreoffice-3.3.2.2, Ubuntu package 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
on Ubuntu lucid lynx, today.
File attached,
cheers, Christian

Revision history for this message

penalvch (penalvch) wrote on 2011-05-18:

#12

Christian A. Reiter, this is not Wishlist as the icon switch occurred in a prior release, as intended. Marking back to Medium.

Changed in openoffice.org (Ubuntu):
importance:	Medium → Wishlist
status:	Incomplete → Triaged
importance:	Wishlist → Medium
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
importance:	Undecided → Medium
status:	New → Triaged

penalvch (penalvch) on 2011-05-18

description:

updated

penalvch (penalvch) on 2011-05-18

tags:

added: lo33

Revision history for this message

penalvch (penalvch) wrote on 2011-05-18:

#13

Christian A. Reiter, what specific steps were done to input the clickable X box object into the attached .doc file? Word?

The only Writer checkbox found in View -> Toolbars -> Form Control was a box with a check mark inside when clicked, and the cursor changes to the arrow appropriately when hovered over it.

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status:	Triaged → Incomplete
Changed in openoffice.org (Ubuntu):
status:	Triaged → Incomplete

Revision history for this message

Christian González (droetker) wrote on 2011-05-19:

#14

test file 2 Edit (10.0 KiB, application/msword)

This is funny.
No, I did this in the LibreOffice version i specified above, 5 minutes before sending the last message.
This is weird - I just tried to do it again, and got the same: a(differently looking) checkbox, which is white and not grey, and with the correct hovering behaviour.
have a look at this file, there are both of them.
I just saved it as .doc not as .odt.
I unzipped the odt to give you the content.xml as well - I cant see much things in it, you maybe more.

Revision history for this message

Christian González (droetker) wrote on 2011-05-19:

#15

odt version Edit (10.5 KiB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)

Revision history for this message

Christian González (droetker) wrote on 2011-05-19:

#16

content part of test.odt Edit (5.6 KiB, text/xml)

penalvch (penalvch) on 2011-05-19

Changed in openoffice.org (Ubuntu):
status:	Incomplete → Triaged
Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
importance:	Medium → Low
status:	Incomplete → Triaged

penalvch (penalvch) on 2011-05-19

summary:

- [ooo-build] cursor should change when hovering over checkbox
+ [ooo-build] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X" box

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, penalvch (penalvch) wrote on 2011-06-04:

#26

Created attachment 47509
Unbenannt 1.doc

Downstream bug may be found at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/207220

Novell bug may be found at:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437569

1) lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04

2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Version table:
*** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 Packages
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/207220/+attachment/2134007/+files/Unbenannt%201.doc && lowriter -nologo Unbenannt\ 1.doc

hover ones mouse cursor over the checkbox and it changes from the I to an arrow.

4) What happens instead is it remains an I.

Revision history for this message

In freedesktop.org Bugzilla #37912, penalvch (penalvch) wrote on 2011-06-04:

#18

Created attachment 47509
Unbenannt 1.doc

Downstream bug may be found at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/207220

Novell bug may be found at:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437569

1) lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04

2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Candidate: 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5
  Version table:
*** 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu5 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-updates/main i386 Packages
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed/main i386 Packages
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     1:3.3.2-1ubuntu4 0
        500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty/main i386 Packages

3) What is expected to happen in LibreOffice Writer via the Terminal:

cd ~/Desktop && wget https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/207220/+attachment/2134007/+files/Unbenannt%201.doc && lowriter -nologo Unbenannt\ 1.doc

hover ones mouse cursor over the checkbox and it changes from the I to an arrow.

4) What happens instead is it remains an I.

Changed in openoffice.org (Ubuntu):
importance:	Medium → Low
summary:	- [ooo-build] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X" box + [Upstream] [ooo-build] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X" + box

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2011-06-04

Changed in df-libreoffice:
importance:	Unknown → Low
status:	Unknown → Confirmed

Björn Michaelsen (bjoern-michaelsen) on 2011-09-15

Changed in openoffice.org (Ubuntu):
status:	Triaged → Won't Fix

Revision history for this message

Björn Michaelsen (bjoern-michaelsen) wrote on 2011-09-15: migrating packaging from OpenOffice.org to Libreoffice

#17

[This is an automated message.]
There are no new official OpenOffice.org releases in Ubuntu packaging anymore => Won't Fix

If the problem persists, please mark this bug as "also affects project Libreoffice" or "also affects distribution Libreoffice (Ubuntu)" if that has not happened already.

Please leave references to upstream OpenOffice.org bugs in place to allow cross pollination.

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Björn Michaelsen (bjoern-michaelsen) wrote on 2011-12-23:

#27

[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html

Revision history for this message

In freedesktop.org Bugzilla #37912, Björn Michaelsen (bjoern-michaelsen) wrote on 2011-12-23:

#19

[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2011-12-24

Changed in df-libreoffice:
status:	Confirmed → Incomplete

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Sasha-libreoffice (sasha-libreoffice) wrote on 2012-01-26:

#28

reproduced in LibO 3.6.0 master on Fedora 64 bit
and in LibO 3.5.0 beta on Windows XP 32 bit

Revision history for this message

In freedesktop.org Bugzilla #37912, Sasha-libreoffice (sasha-libreoffice) wrote on 2012-01-26:

#20

reproduced in LibO 3.6.0 master on Fedora 64 bit
and in LibO 3.5.0 beta on Windows XP 32 bit

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2012-01-26

Changed in df-libreoffice:
status:	Incomplete → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

In freedesktop.org Bugzilla #37912, julien2412 (serval2412-6) wrote on 2012-09-15:

#21

On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I still reproduce this behaviour.

Michael: any idea about this or perhaps some code pointer if it can be an easyhack (for a dev of course! :-))

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, julien2412 (serval2412-6) wrote on 2012-09-15:

#29

On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today, I still reproduce this behaviour.

Michael: any idea about this or perhaps some code pointer if it can be an easyhack (for a dev of course! :-))

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2013-09-30

Changed in openoffice:
importance:	Unknown → Medium

Revision history for this message

In Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #437569, Gp-v (gp-v) wrote on 2014-07-28:

#22

The document is, unfortunately, not available any more under that URL.

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2014-07-30

Changed in openoffice:
status:	Confirmed → Invalid

Revision history for this message

In Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #437569, Christian González (droetker) wrote on 2014-07-30: Re: [Upstream] [ooo-build] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X" box

#23

Look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/207220 (the downstream Ubuntu bug), I have attached some files (Comment #10 onwards) there. They are stripped down versions of the faulty behaviour.

Adolfo Jayme Barrientos (fitojb) on 2014-10-17

summary:

- [Upstream] [ooo-build] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X"
- box
+ [Upstream] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X" box

Revision history for this message

In freedesktop.org Bugzilla #37912, Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote on 2015-01-05:

#24

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.3.5 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case)

Thank you for your help!

-- The LibreOffice QA Team

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote on 2015-01-05:

#30

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.3.5 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case)

Thank you for your help!

-- The LibreOffice QA Team

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Beluga (beluga) wrote on 2015-01-29:

#31

Repro.

Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 784d069cc1d9f1d6e6a4e543a278376ab483d1eb
TinderBox: Win-x86@62-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-01-25_23:07:36

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote on 2016-02-21:

#32

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice
(5.0.5 or 5.1.0) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

   Update the version field
   Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
   Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
   appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for your help!

-- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-02-21

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice 
   (5.0.5 or 5.1.0)  https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and 
   your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior
 
   If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave 
   a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
   Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
   Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
   appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for your help!

-- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-02-21

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote on 2017-03-06:

#33

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice
(5.2.5 or 5.3.0 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo";
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170306

** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice 
(5.2.5 or 5.3.0  https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and 
your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior
 
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave 
a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)

http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo";
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170306

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Thomas-lendo (thomas-lendo) wrote on 2018-10-10:

#34

Still reproducible.

Version: 6.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 425af6845ebe066c950b0b63f50563e067485f3e
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win;
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-10-09_23:30:22
Locale: de-AT (de_AT); Calc: CL

Revision history for this message

Marcus Tomlinson (marcustomlinson) wrote on 2019-08-13:

#25

This release of Ubuntu is no longer receiving maintenance updates. If this is still an issue on a maintained version of Ubuntu please let us know.

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status:	Triaged → Incomplete

Marcus Tomlinson (marcustomlinson) on 2019-08-13

Changed in df-libreoffice:
importance:	Low → Unknown
status:	Confirmed → Unknown

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2019-09-02

Changed in df-libreoffice:
importance:	Unknown → Low
status:	Unknown → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

Marcus Tomlinson (marcustomlinson) wrote on 2019-09-25:

#35

Synchronising bug status with upstream.

Changed in libreoffice (Ubuntu):
status:	Incomplete → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, Qa-admin-q (qa-admin-q) wrote on 2019-10-11:

#36

Dear Christopher M. Penalver,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)

If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword

Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

Revision history for this message

In Document Foundation Bugzilla #37912, timur (ba.timur) wrote on 2021-09-15:

#37

Repro LO 7.3+.
This is Legacy Check Box Form Field in MSO.
This DOC check box doesn't work in MSO 2016, something is wrong, cannot be checked. Also no arrow in MSO with DOC or DOCX.
While no arrow in LO, it can be checked.
I close this bug as NotOutBug. Could be also WontFix.

Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2021-09-15

Changed in df-libreoffice:
status:	Confirmed → Won't Fix

Ubuntu
libreoffice package

[Upstream] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X" box

Bug Description

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

	Status	Importance	Assigned to
LibreOffice	Won't Fix	Low	tdf #37912
OpenOffice	Invalid	Medium	novell-bugs #437569
libreoffice (Ubuntu)	Confirmed	Low	Unassigned
openoffice.org (Ubuntu)	Won't Fix	Low	Unassigned

Ubuntulibreoffice package

[Upstream] cursor does not change to arrow hovering over "X" box

Bug Description

Other bug subscribers

Bug attachments

Remote bug watches

Ubuntu
libreoffice package