Ubuntu
latexila package

Please update LaTeXila to 2.8 (stable) version

Bug #1161800 reported by Vasco Alves
18
This bug affects 4 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
latexila (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
Wishlist
Matthieu Baerts
Ubuntu ubuntu-13.05

Bug Description

Not sure if it's too late to get this in raring, but if possible, update to the new upstream stable version 2.8, found here:
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/latexila/2.8/

Revision history for this message
Matthieu Baerts (matttbe) wrote :

Hello and thank you for this bug report.

Unfortunately, it's too late to upload this new version in Raring. Maybe a FeatureFreeze Exceptions process can be introduced but I guess it's too late (one month after the Feature Freeze and less than one month before the release).

I'll update the official ppa asap! => https://launchpad.net/~latexila/+archive/ppa

Revision history for this message
Matthieu Baerts (matttbe) wrote :

PS: this new version of LaTeXila needs Valac 0.20.0 which has been released 2 days ago... (and of course this new version is not already packaged)

Revision history for this message
Matthieu Baerts (matttbe) wrote :

PS²: and it also needs gtksourceview 3.8.0 (which has been released at the beginning of this week)

Revision history for this message
Vasco Alves (vascofalves) wrote :

Yeah, I see this isn't getting an exception. I do hope you manage to get it into the PPA though, as I use LaTeXila quite heavily and I would like the new version.

Revision history for this message
Matthieu Baerts (matttbe) wrote :

You can also ask to Sébastien if it's possible to have a version which can be compiled with Valac 0.18 and GTKSourceView 3.6 ;)
But I guess it's not on his TODO list.

@swilmet: is it correct? :)

Revision history for this message
Sébastien Wilmet (sebastien-wilmet) wrote :

Yes, it's correct. There are not a lot of changes in latexila 2.8, but one of the bigger changes is for the completion, and it would not be possible with gsv 3.6, since most of the improvements are in gsv 3.8.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in latexila (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Matthieu Baerts (matttbe) wrote :

This new version (2.8.1) is now available on Ubuntu repositories (Universe) and on LaTeXila's ppa (only for Saucy users because the latest stable versions of Valac and GtkSourceView are only available on Ubuntu 13.10).

Note that the 'Daily' ppa has been re-enabled: https://launchpad.net/~latexila/+archive/daily

Changed in latexila (Ubuntu):
assignee: nobody → Matthieu Baerts (matttbe)
milestone: none → ubuntu-13.05
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
tags: added: saucy
removed: raring
Changed in latexila (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Wishlist
Revision history for this message
Sione Paea (sione-paea) wrote :

hi guys, need help. I have a problem in my latexila.
I have four authors in my article, the second and the last authors have the same affiliation but latexila display "this is revtex4-1: Assuming \noaffiliation for AUTHOR NAME." The pdf output put the last two authors in the same affilation. Any help Thanks

Revision history for this message
Matthieu Baerts (matttbe) wrote :

Hello and thank you for this bug report.

But if I understand well the problem, this bug is not due to LaTeXila (the editor) but with LaTeX.
If yes, please ask your question on a forum about LaTeX ;-) (e.g. http://tex.stackexchange.com/ ).
If no, if this bug is due to the editor, please open a new bug report.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.
Subscribing...

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.