Inconsistent licence in github.com/juju/utils/series
Bug #1604988 reported by
Martin Packman
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Canonical Juju |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Anastasia | ||
juju-core |
Won't Fix
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
1.25 |
Fix Released
|
Critical
|
Anastasia | ||
juju-core (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
The per-file copyright headers in the series/ package of the juju/utils project all state:
// Licensed under the AGPLv3, see LICENCE file for details.
However the top level LICENCE file is LGPLv3 with exception. This confuses the issue for distribution.
Changed in juju-core: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in juju-core: | |
milestone: | none → 2.0.0 |
affects: | juju-core → juju |
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | 2.0.0 → none |
milestone: | none → 2.0.0 |
Changed in juju-core: | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in juju-core: | |
status: | Triaged → Won't Fix |
Changed in juju: | |
milestone: | 2.0.0 → 2.0-beta18 |
assignee: | nobody → Anastasia (anastasia-macmood) |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | Triaged → In Progress |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | In Progress → Fix Committed |
Changed in juju: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
Changed in juju-core (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
@Martin
To clarify:
Do the file headers in series package need to reflect what top level LICENCE file says?
Or does the LICENCE file need to be updated with AGPLv3?