Activity log for bug #1444037

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2015-04-14 15:53:47 Oleg Strikov bug added bug
2015-04-15 12:50:33 Curtis Hovey juju-core: status New Triaged
2015-04-15 12:50:35 Curtis Hovey juju-core: importance Undecided High
2015-04-15 12:50:39 Curtis Hovey juju-core: assignee Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
2015-04-15 12:51:06 Curtis Hovey tags block-proposed block-proposed packaging
2015-04-15 16:18:43 Robie Basak bug added subscriber Robie Basak
2015-04-15 16:19:51 Oleg Strikov affects juju-core juju-core (Ubuntu)
2015-04-15 16:23:00 Robie Basak nominated for series Ubuntu Trusty
2015-04-15 16:23:00 Robie Basak bug task added juju-core (Ubuntu Trusty)
2015-04-15 16:25:38 Oleg Strikov juju-core (Ubuntu): assignee Curtis Hovey (sinzui)
2015-04-15 16:25:42 Oleg Strikov juju-core (Ubuntu): assignee Oleg Strikov (strikov)
2015-04-15 16:25:46 Oleg Strikov juju-core (Ubuntu Trusty): assignee Oleg Strikov (strikov)
2015-04-15 17:28:33 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/juju-core
2015-04-15 17:31:59 Nobuto Murata bug added subscriber Nobuto Murata
2015-04-15 20:08:49 Curtis Hovey bug added subscriber Curtis Hovey
2015-04-16 13:20:44 Curtis Hovey information type Public Private
2015-04-16 13:21:41 Curtis Hovey removed subscriber Nobuto Murata
2015-04-16 13:21:41 Curtis Hovey removed subscriber Robie Basak
2015-04-16 13:22:22 Curtis Hovey attachment added logs from machine 14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1444037/+attachment/4377157/+files/machine-14.log.xz
2015-04-16 13:22:48 Curtis Hovey attachment removed logs from machine 14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/juju-core/+bug/1444037/+attachment/4377157/+files/machine-14.log.xz
2015-04-16 13:23:15 Curtis Hovey information type Private Public
2015-04-16 14:38:28 Curtis Hovey description We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): TODO [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: TODO [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: TODO [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: TODO Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: TODO [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: TODO The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): TODO [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: DONE [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: TODO [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: TODO Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: TODO [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: TODO The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO
2015-04-16 15:29:59 Curtis Hovey description We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): TODO [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: DONE [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: TODO [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: TODO Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: TODO [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: TODO The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): TODO [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: DONE [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: TODO [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: TODO Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: DONE [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: TODO The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO
2015-04-16 15:46:35 Oleg Strikov description We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): TODO [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: DONE [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: TODO [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: TODO Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: DONE [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: TODO The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): DONE [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: DONE [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: TODO [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: TODO Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: DONE [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: TODO The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO
2015-04-16 15:49:23 Oleg Strikov tags block-proposed packaging packaging
2015-04-16 16:08:14 Launchpad Janitor juju-core (Ubuntu): status Triaged Fix Released
2015-04-23 14:49:21 Robie Basak juju-core (Ubuntu Trusty): status New In Progress
2015-05-06 17:44:24 Steve Langasek juju-core (Ubuntu Trusty): status In Progress Fix Committed
2015-05-06 17:44:26 Steve Langasek bug added subscriber Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
2015-05-06 17:44:27 Steve Langasek bug added subscriber SRU Verification
2015-05-06 17:44:32 Steve Langasek tags packaging packaging verification-needed
2015-05-08 15:08:58 Curtis Hovey description We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): DONE [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: DONE [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: TODO [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: TODO Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: DONE [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: TODO The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO We're now in a position to have 1.22.1 enter trusty-proposed and vivid-proposed, but it should not land in trusty or vivid until upstream passes QA on our proposed binaries, published the tools in their stable simplestream and announces the release for general production use. [SRU Information] juju-core has a stable release exception in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/MicroReleaseExceptions, including for major version updates. [Development Fix] Upload of new upstream release with packaging review. [strikov] will remove the block-proposed tag when verification has passed, and then this update should migrate to vivid. [Stable Fix] Full backport of new upstream release. [Pre-QA tasks] [strikov] Upload to the development release (vivid-proposed): DONE [strikov] Upload to the current LTS release (trusty-proposed): TODO [QA Status] Since there are multiple verifications required, they are listed here as a work item whiteboard status type thing rather than try and track them in a single tag. Please do not mark verification-done or remove block-proposed until all following items have passed. If any of these items fail, this bug should be marked verification-failed immediately. [sinzui] Upsteam QA test against Vivid: DONE [sinzui] Upstream QA test against Trusty: DONE [sinzui] Upstream release process complete: DONE Manual tests required: [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against vivid-proposed: DONE [sinzui] Test juju-quickstart against trusty-proposed: DONE The following stakeholders have expressed an interest in performing their own tests and we will wait for a (timely) acknowledgement from them before removing the -proposed blocks. If you also have an interest in testing new Juju releases before they land in an SRU, then please comment in this bug. Landscape team QA: TODO
2015-05-08 16:34:44 Oleg Strikov tags packaging verification-needed packaging verification-done
2015-05-14 14:05:08 Oleg Strikov tags packaging verification-done packaging verification-failed
2015-05-28 03:12:46 Launchpad Janitor branch linked lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/juju-core
2015-06-01 08:38:52 Nobuto Murata bug added subscriber Nobuto Murata
2015-06-24 03:20:11 Ray Wang bug added subscriber Ray Wang
2015-06-30 06:39:04 Nobuto Murata marked as duplicate 1469744
2015-07-28 17:35:15 Launchpad Janitor juju-core (Ubuntu Trusty): status Fix Committed Fix Released