On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:53:22AM -0000, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote:
> Additionally, four days ago, the developer of ipxe mentioned on IRC that:
> > (02:44:57 πμ) mcb30: I finally managed to get my new UEFI Secure Boot
> > key registered with Microsoft's new UI
> > (02:46:52 πμ) mcb30: As I'm about to start submitting
> > https://github.com/ipxe/ProxyLoaderPkg for signing, I discover that the
> > whole Coverity Scan service went offline last week, so I have no static
> > analysis results to show for the submission
> I believe that secure boot support in iPXE may take some time, but it'll
> be available eventually.
Unless they're also doing reproducible binary builds, this is not relevant,
since the binary signed by Microsoft would not match what's in the Ubuntu
archive.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:53:22AM -0000, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote:
> Additionally, four days ago, the developer of ipxe mentioned on IRC that: /github. com/ipxe/ ProxyLoaderPkg for signing, I discover that the
> > (02:44:57 πμ) mcb30: I finally managed to get my new UEFI Secure Boot
> > key registered with Microsoft's new UI
> > (02:46:52 πμ) mcb30: As I'm about to start submitting
> > https:/
> > whole Coverity Scan service went offline last week, so I have no static
> > analysis results to show for the submission
> I believe that secure boot support in iPXE may take some time, but it'll
> be available eventually.
Unless they're also doing reproducible binary builds, this is not relevant,
since the binary signed by Microsoft would not match what's in the Ubuntu
archive.