Thanks for the clarification! So comment #2 is not correct, I guess or I misinterpreted it.
So imagemagick is not part of the "Server LTS", which seems to me a bit odd (independently of whether the lucid imagemagick package is affected by this bug or not).
Thanks for the clarification! So comment #2 is not correct, I guess or I misinterpreted it.
So imagemagick is not part of the "Server LTS", which seems to me a bit odd (independently of whether the lucid imagemagick package is affected by this bug or not).