changing priority (nice) value of a process changes only first thread
Bug #539594 reported by
Коренберг Марк
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gnome System Monitor |
Expired
|
Medium
|
|||
| gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu) |
Triaged
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Binary package hint: gnome-system-
For exampl. I have started 7z archive creation. It spawn two threads eting both CPUs. After changing priority using gnome system monitor, only first thread (tid=pid) is changed. second thread continue using default (zero) nice value.
It's a bug, I thik
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Mar 16 18:54:31 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/
Package: gnome-system-
ProcEnviron:
LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
PATH=(custom, user)
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSign
SourcePackage: gnome-system-
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-
Revision history for this message
| Коренберг Марк (socketpair) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu): | |
| importance: | Undecided → Low |
Revision history for this message
| Pedro Villavicencio (pedro) wrote | #2 |
| Changed in gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Incomplete |
Revision history for this message
| Коренберг Марк (socketpair) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Incomplete → New |
Revision history for this message
| Robert Roth (evfool) wrote | #4 |
| Changed in gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Triaged |
| Changed in gnome-system-monitor: | |
| importance: | Unknown → Medium |
| status: | Unknown → New |
| Changed in gnome-system-monitor: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in gnome-system-monitor: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Expired |
To post a comment you must log in.
Thanks for the report, it has been some time without any response or feedback in this bug report and we are wondering if this is still an issue for you with the latest release of Ubuntu the Natty Narwhal, May you please test with that version and comment back if you're still having or not the issue? Please have a look at http://