gnome-screensaver-dialog crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

Bug #807660 reported by rolmops
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

gnome-screensaver-dialog crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: gnome-screensaver 3.0.0-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0-3.4-generic 3.0.0-rc5
Uname: Linux 3.0-3-generic i686
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Fri Jul 8 05:37:06 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/gnome-screensaver/gnome-screensaver-dialog
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/gnome-screensaver/gnome-screensaver-dialog --status-message= --enable-switch
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x8050618: mov 0x8,%eax
 PC (0x08050618) ok
 source "0x8" (0x00000008) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%eax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: gnome-screensaver
StacktraceTop:
 ?? ()
 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_closure_invoke () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_signal_emit_valist () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: gnome-screensaver-dialog crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare

Revision history for this message
rolmops (dr150259) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #804195, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.