Ubuntu
gnome-power-manager package

No remaining time displayed when on battery

Bug #570940 reported by Vörös Csaba on 2010-04-27

This bug affects 7 people

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)	Confirmed	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: indicator-application

Battery monitor doesnt reports any time, no charge time, no discharge.
Had same issue in 9.10.

Using Lenovo N200 3000.

Release: 10.04

Cheers Csaba
---
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: No
GnomeSessionInhibitors: None
GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: No
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Release Candidate i386 (20100419.1)
MachineType: LENOVO 0769BNG
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.30.0-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-21-generic root=UUID=630cef8b-e4d1-40a7-864e-3c8354dea237 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-21.32-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Tags: lucid
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-21-generic i686
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare
dmi.bios.date: 10/17/2007
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 68ET26WW
dmi.board.name: IEL10
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: REFERENCE
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: No Enclosure
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr68ET26WW:bd10/17/2007:svnLENOVO:pn0769BNG:pvr3000N200:rvnLENOVO:rnIEL10:rvrREFERENCE:cvnNoEnclosure:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.name: 0769BNG
dmi.product.version: 3000 N200
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO

See original description

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Omer Akram (om26er) wrote on 2010-04-27:

Please type apport collect 570940 in terminal so that the required information of your system gets attached to this bug report

affects:

indicator-application (Ubuntu) → gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: BootDmesg.txt

BootDmesg.txt Edit (49.5 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

tags:	added: apport-collected
description:	updated

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: CurrentDmesg.txt

CurrentDmesg.txt Edit (882 bytes, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: Dependencies.txt

Dependencies.txt Edit (5.7 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: DevkitPower.txt

DevkitPower.txt Edit (1.3 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: GConfNonDefault.txt

GConfNonDefault.txt Edit (702 bytes, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: Lspci.txt

Lspci.txt Edit (15.7 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: Lsusb.txt

Lsusb.txt Edit (668 bytes, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: ProcCpuinfo.txt

ProcCpuinfo.txt Edit (1.5 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: ProcInterrupts.txt

#10

ProcInterrupts.txt Edit (1.6 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: ProcModules.txt

#11

ProcModules.txt Edit (2.7 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: UdevDb.txt

#12

UdevDb.txt Edit (108.0 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: UdevLog.txt

#13

UdevLog.txt Edit (237.1 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28: gnome-power-bugreport.txt

#14

gnome-power-bugreport.txt Edit (4.0 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-04-28:

#15

Done, if you need anything else pls let me know!

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18:

#16

I have this problem on my Dell Mini 9. Submitting my info, hope it helps. Would really like to see the estimated time remaining again!

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: apport information

#17

Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
GnomeSessionIdleInhibited: Unknown
GnomeSessionInhibitors: Failed to acquire
GnomeSessionSuspendInhibited: Unknown
MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 910
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
Package: gnome-power-manager 2.30.0-0ubuntu1
PackageArchitecture: i386
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-22-lpia-tuxonice root=UUID=5763705e-4aea-499b-a989-6ea89eb69d90 ro splash
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_GB.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-22.60~ppa4-lpia-tuxonice
Tags: lucid
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-22-lpia-tuxonice i686
UserGroups:

dmi.bios.date: 12/29/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A04
dmi.board.name: CN0J14
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A04
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.version: A04
dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA04:bd12/29/2008:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron910:pvrA04:rvnDellInc.:rnCN0J14:rvrA04:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvrA04:
dmi.product.name: Inspiron 910
dmi.product.version: A04
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: BootDmesg.txt

#18

BootDmesg.txt Edit (42.2 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: CurrentDmesg.txt

#19

CurrentDmesg.txt Edit (121.8 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: Dependencies.txt

#20

Dependencies.txt Edit (5.8 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: DevkitPower.txt

#21

DevkitPower.txt Edit (1.3 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: GConfNonDefault.txt

#22

GConfNonDefault.txt Edit (543 bytes, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: Lspci.txt

#23

Lspci.txt Edit (24.0 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: Lsusb.txt

#24

Lsusb.txt Edit (360 bytes, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: ProcCpuinfo.txt

#25

ProcCpuinfo.txt Edit (1.3 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: ProcInterrupts.txt

#26

ProcInterrupts.txt Edit (1.5 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: ProcModules.txt

#27

ProcModules.txt Edit (2.9 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: UdevDb.txt

#28

UdevDb.txt Edit (90.7 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: UdevLog.txt

#29

UdevLog.txt Edit (182.2 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-07-18: gnome-power-bugreport.txt

#30

gnome-power-bugreport.txt Edit (4.0 KiB, text/plain)

apport information

hackel (hackel) on 2010-09-18

Changed in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu):
status:	New → Confirmed

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2010-11-07:

#31

FYI still exists in Maverick.

Revision history for this message

Vörös Csaba (voros-csaba) wrote on 2010-11-08:

#32

Same at me Ubuntu 10.10... sad.

Revision history for this message

hackel (hackel) wrote on 2011-04-05:

#33

I would like to report that this is finally fixed for me in Natty beta! Seems like it's probably more of a coincidence or a kernel improvement, but as long as it works I'm happy! Can anyone else confirm this?