Activity log for bug #203804
| Date | Who | What changed | Old value | New value | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-03-19 04:18:07 | Adam Buchbinder | bug | added bug | ||
| 2008-08-08 14:35:16 | Pedro Villavicencio | evince: status | New | Invalid | |
| 2008-08-08 14:35:16 | Pedro Villavicencio | evince: statusexplanation | thanks for the report, this doesn't happens with the evince version availble on intrepid, there's no need to have the tetex-bin package installed to see the file. thanks. | ||
| 2008-08-08 15:48:17 | Adam Buchbinder | evince: status | Invalid | New | |
| 2008-08-08 16:35:15 | Sebastien Bacher | evince: status | New | Triaged | |
| 2008-08-08 16:35:15 | Sebastien Bacher | evince: assignee | desktop-bugs | ||
| 2008-08-08 16:35:15 | Sebastien Bacher | evince: importance | Undecided | Low | |
| 2008-08-08 16:35:15 | Sebastien Bacher | evince: statusexplanation | evince 2.22.2-0ubuntu1 on Hardy still does the same if there's no TeX installation. Whether the TeX distribution involved is teTeX or TeX Live, the question is what evince's behavior is when presented with a valid DVI in the absence of a TeX distribution. I don't have an Intrepid box available, but if opening a valid DVI document with evince on a machine that doesn't have TeX installed still gives an error implying that there's a problem with the document, rather than with the installation, then this bug is still valid. It has absolutely nothing to do with the transition from teTeX to TeX Live. | the issue is known upstream, you can read about it on http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543905 | |
| 2008-08-08 16:35:28 | Sebastien Bacher | bug | assigned to evince | ||
| 2008-08-08 17:14:56 | Bug Watch Updater | evince: status | Unknown | New | |
| 2008-12-06 14:43:44 | Adam Buchbinder | marked as duplicate | 42410 |
