Partitions presented to instance should be ext3, not ext2
Bug #457281 reported by
Thierry Carrez
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eucalyptus |
Triaged
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
2.0 |
Confirmed
|
Low
|
graziano obertelli | ||
eucalyptus (Ubuntu) |
Triaged
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Lucid |
Won't Fix
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
UEC setup based on 20091020.3 / 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7
Booting c1.medium UEC images, I notice the following:
i386 image:
/etc/fstab has "/dev/sda2 /mnt ext3"
Instance is provided with:
/dev/sda2: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
This results in failure to mount at boot, with messages like "ext3: No journal on filesystem on sda2"
amd64 images:
/etc/fstab has "/dev/sdb /mnt ext3"
Instance has the following device:
/dev/sda2: Linux rev 1.0 ext2 filesystem data
This results in failure to mount at boot, with messages like "/mnt: waiting for /dev/sdb"
To be compliant with what EC2 does, Eucalyptus should provide instances with ext3 filesystems, not ext2.
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Lucid): | |
milestone: | lucid-alpha-3 → none |
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Lucid): | |
status: | Triaged → Won't Fix |
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) → nobody |
Changed in eucalyptus (Ubuntu Lucid): | |
assignee: | Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) → nobody |
Changed in eucalyptus: | |
status: | In Progress → Triaged |
Changed in eucalyptus: | |
assignee: | Daniel Nurmi (nurmi) → graziano obertelli (graziano.obertelli) |
milestone: | none → 2.0.4 |
Changed in eucalyptus: | |
milestone: | 2.0.4 → none |
assignee: | graziano obertelli (graziano.obertelli) → nobody |
To post a comment you must log in.
I see the same thing in my amd64 guests.
:-Dustin